My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-08-04_INSPECTION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2015-08-04_INSPECTION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:09:43 PM
Creation date
8/5/2015 7:18:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
8/4/2015
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Inspection Date
7/28/2015
Email Name
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8/5/2015 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - July inspections at NECC mines <br />STATE, OF Hernandez - DNR AI sha <al DNRsha.hernandez@state.co.us> <br />COLORADO , Y Y <br />July inspections at NECC mines <br />-I message <br />Simmons - DNR, Leigh <leigh.simmons@state.co.us> Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:43 PM <br />To: Vince Massarotti <vincem@newelkcoal.com>, Ron Thompson <ronthompson@newelkcoal.com>, Louis Head <br /><Ihead@newelkcoal.com>, Alysha Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez@state.co.us> <br />All, <br />Attached are reports from the July inspections at the New Elk (C1981012), Golden Eagle (C1981013), and <br />Lorencito Canyon (C1996084) mines. <br />During the inspection Vince asked about the silt fence at the topsoil stockpile #2 SAE (to the northwest of the <br />processing plant), and whether it could be replaced with an alternative sediment control device. <br />My reading of the PAP is that the SAE demonstration was made using SEDCAD, in 1993. It is in exhibit 19. The <br />demonstration appears to show that Total Settleable Solids will be below the discharge limit of 0.5 mL/L without <br />any additional sediment control. The silt fence in place represents a "best management practice". I see nothing <br />in the permit or the rules that specify a silt fence must be used. <br />Rule 4.05.5 describes performance standards for sediment control measures, in particular 4.05.5(2)(0 lists "straw <br />dikes, riprap, check dams, mulches, vegetative sediment filters, dugout ponds, and other measures that reduce <br />overland flow velocity, reduce runoff volume, or trap sediment" as structures that could be used a sediment <br />control method. <br />Before you proceed to replace the silt fence with a more durable alternative I suggest that you consult the newly <br />issued discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division to check its requirements (since the SAE now <br />has a designated outfall). <br />eigh Simmons <br />Depw,tmerrt of Natural Resources <br />es} <br />3 attachments <br />INSP-REPORTC_C1981012_LDS_08032015040100.pdf <br />1263K <br />n INSP-REPORTC_C1981013_LDS_08032015020232.pdf <br />248K <br />INSP-REPORTC_C1996084_LDS_08042015125616.pdf <br />8955K <br />https://m ail.googl e.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&i k=e29129fcb5&view= pt&search= i nbox&th=14efa3de6bdc92ae&si m l=14efa3de6bdc92ae 1/1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.