Laserfiche WebLink
Aw <br />February 25, 2015 <br />MAR 'a 3 2015 <br />Mr. Daniel Hernandez <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety L'ivi�r ofReclamati,. o.,, iinir'iii�y� ;� �a�ia�y <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 Certified Return Receipt Mail #70062150000246443495 <br />RE: Request for Formal Hearing for the New Horizon Mine (Permit No. C- 1981-008), Minor <br />Revision No. 92 (MR -92) dated February 20, 2015. <br />I, Jimmy R. Guire 11, herby request a formal hearing as allowed in accordance with Rule 2.08.4(6)(c)(iii) <br />and conducted in accordance with the requirements of 2.07.4(3). <br />I am a member /manager of TMR47, LLC, who owns 131.84 acres, and approximately the northern 91 <br />acres are included in Permit Number C- 1981 -008 under a lease to Western Fuels - Colorado, LLCs New <br />Horizon Mine. <br />Since we purchased the property formerly known as the San Miguel Power parcel (Montrose County <br />Assessor Parcel Number 4269 -062-00 -014) (SMP) , we have had ongoing disputes with Western Fuels - <br />Colorado, LLC (WFC), many of those have been settled by agreement. <br />However, one main issue still remains in recognition of the legal property boundaries of our property. <br />WFC even went so far as to hire a survey company to survey our property in June, 2014, the survey plat <br />was recorded 9/16/2014 at Reception Number 858924 with the Montrose County Recorder's Office, to <br />try and disprove our claims. This survey shows that the legal boundary WFC has been using is off on the <br />east side, cheating us out of 11.84 acres, approximately another 9 acres now mined and reclaimed again <br />cheating us out of our hay production. We have met with WFC/Tri -State representatives to settle this <br />but was told to "continue" to use the pre -survey boundaries so that the information would "continue" <br />to match up with maps, documentation and reports WFC has submitted to the Division of Reclamation <br />Mining and Safety, and they told us they will meet with us and "make it right". When will this happen? <br />After not receiving any correspondence from WFC, I sent WFC a notice of default under the terms of the <br />mining lease and through the Amendment to Assignment of Mining Lease outlining the coal royalties not <br />paid to SMP on the reaffirmed acreage of approx. 9 acres. The exact acreage was to be provided by <br />WFC/Tri -State per our conference on July 28, 2014. There was no response from WFC/Tri- State, so we <br />figured conservatively 8 acres on the spreadsheet we submitted to WFC/Tri- State. <br />There has been no documentation provided to us showing that legal proceedings against our property <br />either through quite title action or adverse possession have occurred. Yet, through their attorney Mr. <br />Chris Kamper WFC continues to dispute the recognition of the results of the recorded survey which was <br />requested and paid for by WFC regarding our property. WFC through their attorney Mr. Kamper is <br />determined to come up with any excuse they can to dismiss the fact that we own the entire parcels as <br />described in deeds as well as what was described in the survey and not to mention the Opinion of Title <br />Report provided to WFC back in 1992. Mr. Kamper stated that WFC has paid royalties on our 9 acres to <br />our neighbor. It is not a burden of the land owner, but is the responsibility of the mine operator to <br />make sure monies are paid to the "legal" owner of record on the coal. <br />