Laserfiche WebLink
Ll <br /> Hankins stone Co., Inc. <br /> Po box 164 <br /> Dove creek, co 81324 -3ff <br /> Colorado <br /> Division of Reclamation, A�'4 1 g2$t14 <br /> Mining and safety <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> 1313 Sherman St, Room 215 } ' <br /> Denver Co 80203 ��( "'yt.1r " cl{" ►Orj <br /> Attn: Kate A. Pickford <br /> Environmental Protection specialist <br /> August 18, 2014 <br /> RE: Hankins Stone Quarry #1, Permit No. M-2WD-154, Financial warranty Increase, <br /> Revision No. SI-1 <br /> Dear Ms. Pickford: <br /> we received your letter notifying us of an increase of S11,486.66 in the Financial <br /> warranty Bond. AS per our conversation, <br /> I believe the classification of stone from "Partly consolidated stockpile" in 2008 . <br /> to "Rock, well ripped or blasted 0.8" in 2014 <br /> to be inaccurate. The stone in the photo's we discussed are stone that still has <br /> value and use to us and is not considered overburden. <br /> I believe the classification from 2008, "Partly consolidated stockpile", is a more <br /> accurate description of our overburden. <br /> Also in Mr. Erickson's report from 2008, Task #002 the material consistency is <br /> listed at 1.10 with a unit cost of $.0352. The material consistency on your report <br /> from 2014 lists it as .800 with a unit cost of S.622 nearly double that number from <br /> 2008. Is there any way you <br /> could reconsider the classification of our overburden? I believe the volume listed <br /> is consistent with current overburden piles however the amount of time needed to <br /> reclaim, has risen from 33.37 hours in the 2008 report to 45.87 hours in 2014. I <br /> think the time should remain the same as 2008 based on the volume of overburden. <br /> Thank you for your time today in answering all my questions. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Glenda Hankins <br /> Hankins Stone company <br /> Ph: 970-677-2909 <br />