My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-06-30_REVISION - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-06-30_REVISION - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:08 PM
Creation date
6/30/2014 9:58:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/30/2014
Doc Name
Comment Letter
From
History Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR90
Email Name
SLB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
€CI <br />HISTORY <br />June 25, 2014 <br />Susan L. Burgmaier <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Rece/ V <br />el) <br />JUN 30 2014 <br />DMSIpN �� <br />MINING S rCS � <br />Re: Bowie No. 2 Mine (Permit No. C- 1996 -083), Technical Revision No. 90 (TR -90), New GVBs B1 7F and B1 9C, <br />Relocate B15A, Delta County, Colorado (CHS # 66171) <br />Dear Ms. Burgmaier: <br />Thank you for your correspondence dated June 18, 2014 (received by our office on June 23, 2014) regarding the <br />subject undertaking. The supplemental GIS shapefiles and associated maps provided via e -mail on June 18, 2014 has <br />again greatly facilitated our review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing <br />regulations 36 CFR Part 800, as amended. <br />After review of the documentation provided, it is our opinion that a fording of no historic properties affected [36 <br />CFR 800.4(d)(1)] is appropriate for the proposed undertaking. This determination of effect is based on the <br />negative results of all prior cultural resources inventory within the proposed area of potential effects. <br />The Section 106 consultation process does involve other consulting parties such as federal agencies (including the <br />Bureau of Land Managment Uncompahgre Field Office), local governments, and Tribes, which as stipulated in 36 <br />CFR 800.3 are required to be notified of the undertaking. Additional information provided by these or other <br />consulting parties may cause our office to re- evaluate our comments and recommendations. <br />Should unidentified archaeological resources be discovered in the course of the projects, work must be interrupted until <br />the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria (36 CFR 60.4) <br />in consultation with our office. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Mark Tobias, Section <br />106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866 -4674 or mark.tobias@state.co.us. <br />Sincerely, <br />Edward C. Nichols <br />State Historic Preservation Officer <br />ECN /MAT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.