My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-05-05_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-05-05_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:43:46 PM
Creation date
5/6/2014 8:46:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/5/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Response #4
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR77
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:: <br />J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />2352 NORTH 7TH STREEET, UNIT B <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501 <br />PHONE: (970) 245 -4101, FAX: (970) 242 -7908 <br />MINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />May 5, 2014 <br />Susan Burgmaier <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Bowie Resources, LLC, Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />Technical Revision #77, Substitute Topsoil Plan <br />Adequacy Response #4 <br />Permit C- 1998 -083 <br />Dear Ms. Burgmaier: <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />CONST. MANAGEMENT <br />The DRMS' letter dated May 2, 2014 requested additional information. On behalf of <br />Bowie Resources, LLC, enclosed is the revised data. <br />1. DRMS /BOW2: Item resolved. <br />2. DRMSIBOW2: Item resolved. <br />3. DRMSIBOW2: Item resolved. <br />4. DRMSIBOW2: Item resolved. <br />N1 <br />a. Item resolved <br />b. i. Item resolved. <br />ii. DRMS: BRL's adequacy review response letter provides an explanation for <br />the significant difference in the topsoil material that was projected to be salvaged <br />in the Gob Piles #2 and #4 disturbed areas. The revised pages 14 and 15 of <br />Volume IX as well as revised Appendix A do not provide an explanation of why <br />less topsoil is available for reclamation than was projected. Please revise <br />pages 14 and 15 and Appendix A of Volume 1X to include an explanation <br />for the discrepancy in the predicted and actual topsoil salvage volumes, as <br />outlined in BRL's adequacy response letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.