Laserfiche WebLink
HISTORY <br />March 25, 2014 <br />Susan L. Burgmaier MAR 312014 <br />Environmental Protection Specialist OIM$ION OF RMLAI ATCH <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Bowie No. 2 Mine (Permit No. C- 1996 -083), Permit Revision Application No. 14 (PR -14), Spruce Stomp Lease, <br />Delta County, Colorado (CHS # 65660) <br />Dear Ms. Burgmaier: <br />Thank you for your correspondence dated March 20, 2014 (received by our office on March 24, 2014) regarding the <br />subject permit revision. Our files indicate that the U.S. Forest Service (Forest) as lead federal agency initiated Section <br />106 consultation with our office for the proposed lease modification on February 5, 2013. <br />In summary, the Forest completed intensive cultural resources survey of the Spruce Stomp Lease area that identified <br />three sites eligible for listing to the National Register of Historic Places (corresponding to 5DT96, 5DT698, and <br />5DT1719) and one site (5DT90) that required additional evaluative study (or `need data) within the enlarged 1,850 - <br />acre permit boundary. As two of these sites (5DT90 and 5DT96) were identified within subsidence zones —areas <br />located above or adjacent to planned longwall mining panels —the Forest in consultation with our office <br />recommended that these sites be periodically monitored to "better understand potential future impacts to cultural <br />resources in subsidence zones, as well as ensure any potential adverse effects are mitigated if necessary." Our office <br />concurred with the Forest's management recommendation as well as its finding of no adverse effect in our April 16, <br />2013 letter response (see attachment). As additional surface disturbance is not currently proposed by the revision <br />application, it is our opinion that our prior effects determination with conditions still applies and is appropriate. <br />The Section 106 consultation process does involve other consulting parties such as federal agencies (including the <br />Forest and Bureau of Land Management), local governments, and Tribes, which as stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 are <br />required to be notified of the undertaking. Additional information provided by these or other consulting parties <br />may cause our office to re- evaluate our comments and recommendations. <br />Should unidentified archaeological resources be discovered in the course of the projects, work must be interrupted until <br />the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria (36 CFR 60.4) <br />in consultation with our office. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Mark Tobias, Section <br />106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866 -4674 or mark. tobias n,state.co.us <br />Sincerely, <br />Edward C. Nichols <br />State Historic Preservation Officer <br />ECN /MAT <br />enclosure <br />