My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-10_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-02-10_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:52 PM
Creation date
2/10/2014 12:30:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/10/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR85
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />2352 NORTH 7T" STREEET, UNIT B <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501 <br />PHONE: (970) 245 -4101, FAX: (970) 242 -7908 <br />MINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />February 3, 2014 <br />Susan Burgmaier <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Bowie Resources, LLC, Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />Technical Revision #85, Gob Pile #2 drying area <br />Permit C- 1996 -083 <br />Dear Ms. Burgmaier: <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />CONST. MANAGEMENT <br />"'ICiV •d <br />FEB 10 2014 <br />D /V�SIpN CF RcC <br />h ",It�INGgND S� An01V <br />E1Y <br />The DRMS' letter dated January 16, 2014 requested additional information. On behalf <br />of Bowie Resources, LLC, enclosed are the requested data. <br />Rules 4.10.1 and 4.10.4 <br />1. RMS: The first bullet of the assumptions section of the December 5, 2013 <br />Buckhorn Geotech report gives material properties for compacted coal mine waste <br />that differ from those presented in the recent 15 -Oct -2013 Buckhorn analysis <br />submitted for TR -84. Specifically, the average moist unit weight is given as 109 pcf <br />in this study, whereas the October report used 104.6 pcf. While the material does <br />include inherent variability, as established by the regular compaction tests that are <br />conducted, it would be helpful to use consistent values in all stability analyses, with <br />any sensitivity to this parameter being considered as necessary. Please review <br />the properties for the various materials used in the December 5, 2013 <br />analysis, ensuring that consistent, appropriate values are utilized from <br />one study to the next, <br />BOW2: Please see Buckhorn's response in attached document. <br />2. DRMS: The second bullet of the assumptions section of the December 5, 2013 <br />Buckhorn Geotech report reads, "No phreatic surface was modeled in either the gob <br />or native material which is consistent with our analyses of pile #2 to date." The <br />Division's review of Buckhorn's earlier Gob Pile #2 analyses found that the 22 -Sep- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.