Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />January 16, 2014 <br />William A. Bear <br />Bowie Resources, LLC <br />P.O. Box 483 <br />Paonia, CO 81428 <br />Re: Bowie No. 2 Mine (Permit No. C- 1996 -083) <br />Technical Revision No. 85 (TR- 85) <br />Gob Pile #2 Temporary Drying Area <br />Dear Mr. Bear: <br />COLORADO <br />ID I V I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />The Division has completed a preliminary adequacy review of the technical revision application <br />(TR -85) submitted by Bowie Resources, LLC (BRL) for the Bowie No. 2 Mine. The revision <br />proposes to establish a gob drying area on Gob Pile #2 during the winter months of 2013 -2014. <br />We have the following comments and questions regarding the application. <br />Rules 4.10.1 and 4.10.4 <br />1. The first bullet of the assumptions section of the December 5, 2013 Buckhorn Geotech <br />report gives material properties for compacted coal mine waste that differ from those <br />presented in the recent 15 -Oct -2013 Buckhorn analysis submitted for TR -84. <br />Specifically, the average moist unit weight is given as 109 pcf in this study, whereas the <br />October report used 104.6 pcf. While the material does include inherent variability, as <br />established by the regular compaction tests that are conducted, it would be helpful to <br />use consistent values in all stability analyses, with any sensitivity to this parameter being <br />considered as necessary. Please review the properties for the various materials used in <br />the December 5, 2013 analysis, ensuring that consistent, appropriate values are <br />utilized from one study to the next. <br />2. The second bullet of the assumptions section of the December 5, 2013 Buckhorn <br />Geotech report reads, "No phreatic surface was modeled in either the gob or native <br />material which is consistent with our analyses of pile #2 to date." The Division's review <br />of Buckhorn's earlier Gob Pile #2 analyses found that the 22- Sep -2008 study did <br />consider a phreatic surface based on pore pressure measurements and also conducted a <br />sensitivity analysis using an increased phreatic surface. In that study, block failure as <br />well as circular failure was considered. <br />Buckhorn's Summary of Instrumentation Monitoring for the 3rd Quarter 2013 includes <br />data for a series of Vibrating Wire Piezometers (VWPs) that have been installed in Gob <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />