Laserfiche WebLink
concentrations above their respective analytical reporting limits. Manganese has not been shown to be <br />present above the laboratory reporting limit since April 2011. Reporting limits for iron, manganese, and <br />WAD cyanide are all below the permit concentration values at the M -14 point of compliance. Sulfate <br />concentrations have remained relatively consistent over the last 5 years and are greater than one order of <br />magnitude below the 250 mg/L permit concentration value. The pH found in M -14 has remained within <br />the permit range. Review of the historic TDS concentrations in M -14 shows that TDS concentrations <br />were frequently greater than 400 mg/L even at the time of establishing the permit concentration of 500 <br />mg/L. Since late 2007, the variability in TDS results between sampling events, has increased when <br />compared to previous years. In addition to the permit condition parameters, BMRI has also monitored a <br />number of additional parameters at M -14 which may contribute to an increased TDS concentration and <br />these parameters have not shown any significant concentration increase. A review of water quality <br />parameters in nearby monitoring wells and the downgradient point of compliance monitoring well M -9 <br />did not show any concentrations above the Permit Condition Values and concentrations of other analytes <br />in these wells were consistent with historical results, including the concentrations for TDS. Based upon <br />the review, there was no indication that there has been a change in the water chemistry that would result <br />in the elevated TDS at M -14. <br />During interviews with site personnel and a review of the sampling logbooks for monitoring well M -14, it <br />was found that this well had a dedicated pump up until late 2008 at which time it was removed due to <br />problems with the pump. Since this time, sampling at M -14 has been performed utilizing a portable <br />pump. TR -32 allows for the use of dedicated or portable pumps and sampling can be performed by <br />standard purge or micro purge techniques. While both techniques are acceptable for groundwater <br />sampling, standard purge techniques generally stress the aquifer more than micro purge techniques and <br />may potentially lead to differences in turbidity and TDS. <br />Based upon the review of the historic analytical results, field logbooks, and interviews with site <br />personnel, it is not fully understood why there has been an increased variability of the reported TDS <br />concentrations or if the TDS actually has increased from historical results in monitoring well M -14. It <br />appears that the increased TDS variability in M -14 may be associated with the removal of the dedicated <br />pump in 2008. BMRI would propose as the initial response plan to collect additional water quality <br />samples at monitoring well M -14. BMRI proposes that samples be collected from M -14 on a bi- monthly <br />basis for a period of ninety (90) days utilizing the micro purge sampling technique. The micro purge <br />technique will be conducted as to place minimal stress on the aquifer and minimize impacts of well <br />recovery on the sample collection. The pump intake will be located at or slightly above the middle of the <br />screened interval and drawn directly from the formation with little mixing of casing water or disturbance <br />to the sampling zone. During sampling, pump flow and drawdown will be monitored and minimized to <br />preclude the entrainment of sediment in the water collected for analyses. Water quality indicator <br />parameters including flow, pH, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, temperature and turbidity will be <br />used to determine purging adequacy. Samples will be analyzed on a bi- monthly basis for TDS and on a <br />monthly basis for the on -site ground water well quality parameters listed in Table 2 -4 of TR -32. <br />Analytical results from this response plan will be compared to the historical analytical results and to <br />verify if the TDS concentrations have stabilized utilizing the micro purge sampling method. <br />BMRI will provide Colorado Department of Reclamation, Mining and Safety ( CDRMS) a monthly <br />summary report of the final laboratory analytical results received for all samples collected under this <br />response plan for the previous thirty (30) day period. Additionally, BMRI will prepare a final report <br />summarizing the findings of this response plan and submit this report to CDRMS within thirty (30) days <br />after receiving the final analytical results from the laboratory. <br />