Laserfiche WebLink
6. This item has been resolved <br />New Adequacy Items July 17, 2013) <br />7. Comments on Section 2.03. (While some are outside the immediate scope of TR -03, the <br />Division believes this is an opportune time to update the entire section, where appropriate <br />a) This item has been resolved <br />b) This item has been resolved <br />c) 2.03.4(7) (Surface Ownership) on Pages 8 and 9, submitted on July 8, contains <br />numerous changes to the approved version of the permit, which are not warranted. <br />Specifically, surface owners 13, 42, 49, 50, 52 and 55 have been added (these parcels <br />are not contiguous to the permit area), while owners 47, 59, 64, 65, and 67 have been <br />eliminated (these parcels are contiguous, and need to be retained). Please correct these <br />items (it seems likely that the approved version of 2.03 was not utilized for the pages <br />submitted). Another change made is the consolidation and renaming of owners 2 and 3. <br />Please review, and revise/restore if appropriate. <br />DRMS 08/29: The Surface Ownership was revised with the Aug. 26 submittal — non- <br />contiguous parcels were removed, and contiguous parcels were restored to the list. <br />However, in comparing the names and addresses of the listed parcels with what appears <br />on the Montrose County website (GIS and County Assessor), we found discrepancies in <br />the name and /or address for Parcel Nos. 2 &3, 6, 7, 11, 14, 51, 58, 59, 65, and 67. <br />Please update the ownership and contact information for these parcels, as <br />appropriate. <br />See the revised Section 2.03 pages 8 & 9. <br />d) The Division has a few corrections /comments to the approved version of 2.03.4(7) <br />(Mineral Ownership) on Pages 9 and 10. Specifically: as this section represents <br />contiguous ownership, No. 6 (WFC) should be removed and No. 49 (Wilcox) should be <br />added. No. 54 (Starks) is listed. The Division is aware that WFC purchased this <br />property. If the Starks retained the mineral ownership, no change to this item is <br />required; if WFC now owns the coal, please delete 54 from the list. <br />DRMS 08/29: Mineral Ownership for No. 49 was added, and No. 54 was deleted, as <br />requested. However, No. 6 was not deleted. Please delete No. 6 from this section; it <br />is already covered under 2.03.4(6)(a). <br />See the revised Section 2.03 page 9. <br />e) This item has been resolved <br />f) Section 2.03. 10 lists the various licenses and permits. Please update the DRMS item to <br />show effective and expiration dates (June 20, 2012 and June 20, 2017, respectively); the <br />Compliance Orders on Consent (with reference to the Appendix); the Discharge Permit <br />Appendix; and the DWR permit information (with reference to the Appendix). <br />DRMS 08/29: The DRMS and DWR permit information was updated with the Aug. 26 <br />submittal, and the APCD COC information was provided. Subsequent to the July 17 <br />PAR No. 2, WFC received Initial Approval for the Construction Permit from the <br />