My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-08-19_REVISION - M1990057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1990057
>
2013-08-19_REVISION - M1990057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:19:07 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 4:20:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/19/2013
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW NO. 2: RESPONSE TO ALL QUERIES
From
OPERATOR
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR4
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c�r�` <br />August 12, 2013 <br />Nick Michael <br />Union Milling Company, LLC <br />P.O. Box 620490 <br />Littleton, CO 80162 <br />nmichael@unionmilling.com <br />Re: Leadville Mill TSF <br />GCL Installation over Groundwater Seeps <br />Dear Mr. Michael: <br />CETCO 2870 Forbs Avenue Hoffman Estates, IL 60192 <br />847.851.1800 800.527.9948 Fax 847.851.1339 www.cetco.com <br />Based on our conversation last week, we understand that the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation Mining and Safety has expressed concern over groundwater seeps at the Leadville <br />Mine tailings storage facility (TSF) potentially prematurely hydrating the GCL. We also <br />understand that the seepage rate is approximately 8 gpm (gallons per minute), coming from the <br />northeast corner of the TSF base, and that Union Milling has proposed installing a geonet <br />underneath the GCL in this portion of the site to collect the seep. <br />In our experience, placement of a geonet or drainage geocomposite beneath the <br />GCL /Geomembrane composite liner is a reasonable and well - established method for collecting <br />water underneath the liner system. This installation method has been used on multiple past <br />projects. A brief review of the literature shows that several references on this topic are available, <br />including Koerner (2012), Christopher and Zhao (2003), and Verwiel et al (2001). <br />It is important to note that premature hydration of a GCL is only a concern in the short- <br />term, during installation. If GCL is hydrated prior to the placement of at least one foot of cover <br />material, there is potential for the bentonite in the GCL to swell excessively, resulting in reduced <br />bearing capacity and strength. Placing geonet on the subgrade would route water away from the <br />area, prevent prolonged direct water contact with the GCL. Additionally, we understand that at <br />least one foot of cover material will be placed over the GCL/geomembrane liner immediately <br />after liner placement in the hydrated areas. Installing geonet and cover material should alleviate <br />any concerns of premature hydration. After cover material is installed over the liner system, <br />hydration of the GCL is encouraged for bentonite activation. <br />Because the liner system will be covered with soil or tailings soon after installation, the <br />geonet or drainage geocomposite would only need to be sized for the short-term condition, for <br />water that may come in contact with the GCL immediately after installation. There is no need to <br />size a larger drainage system for future potentially higher water volumes, because as discussed <br />above, water contact with GCL after cover placement is beneficial and encouraged. The <br />estimated water flow rate of approximately 8 gpm across the width of the TSF base corresponds <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.