Laserfiche WebLink
July 23, 2013 C- 1981- 012/New Elk Mine LDS <br />COMPLIANCE. More revisions to the permit are anticipated as the mine moves towards production. This context <br />continues to lend urgency to the need to ensure that the situation on the ground is in full compliance as soon as <br />possible. In particular, the maps should reflect the physical reality, and vice - versa. <br />AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS — Rule 5.02.4(1): <br />Work on the digital record database, described in the inspection reports of October 16, 2012, and April 29, <br />2013, was on- going. In the meantime, NECC continues to maintain paper records. The records were in compliance <br />in Mr Thompson's office (see attached checklist). <br />EXCESS SPOIL and DEVELOPMENT WASTE — Rule 4.09 <br />Placement; Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization: <br />The reclaimed Development Waste Pile (DWDA 1) was stable and well vegetated. Some erosion was <br />evident on the south side of the pile. The erosion should be repaired and reseeded. DWDA 1 is a potential <br />candidate for a phase II bond release application, this would then allow pond 4 to be reclaimed, upon approval of a <br />pond removal demonstration. <br />The Development Waste Disposal Area (DWDA 2) appeared stable however the surface has not been <br />reclaimed and is vulnerable to erosion. Sediment from the pile had washed off during the recent rain events and <br />collected in the ditch surrounding the pile. The sediment level had built up to the point that the ditch was unable to <br />convey the runoff. The ditch had breached in one place and almost breached in another (this is described in greater <br />detail in the HYDROLOGIC BALANCE section). <br />The third Development Waste Disposal Area (DWDA 3), which was approved by TR65, has not yet been <br />bonded for and construction of it has not begun. <br />In order to reduce potential liability, NECC could consider using the RDA to place future development <br />waste, foregoing the need for DWDA 3. Furthermore, the waste currently stored in DWDA 2 could be moved onto <br />the RDA (assuming that the RDA road is upgraded to a haul road, as approved by TR66), and the land currently <br />occupied by DWDA 2 could be used for other purposes, or reclaimed. <br />EXPLOSIVES — Rule 4.08 <br />Distance Prohibitions 4.08.4; Warnings 4.08.4; Control of Adverse Effects 4.08.4: <br />There were no explosives on site; NECC no longer holds an explosives permit. The area where explosives <br />were stored previously was in good order. <br />FISH and WILDLIFE — Rule 4.18: <br />Several dead Ponderosa Pines were observed. Dead trees occurred on the mine site and on the neighboring <br />hillsides. Their occurrence appeared to be slightly biased towards topographical ridges, suggesting that drought <br />stress may be a factor. There was no reason to suspect that the dead trees were attributable to the disturbance of <br />NECC. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 <br />Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; <br />Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br />Drainage — Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 0 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 3 of 29 <br />