My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-08-26_ENFORCEMENT - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2013-08-26_ENFORCEMENT - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:24:16 PM
Creation date
8/26/2013 10:09:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/26/2013
Doc Name
Notice of Violation
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Violation No.
CV2013007
Email Name
LDS
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 23, 2013 C- 1981- 012/New Elk Mine LDS <br />Surface water and sediment control structures were inspected and are described by location, in keeping <br />with the format used in recent inspection reports. NECC had done significant work on culverts. Their policy going <br />forward is to use only thicker 12 gauge culverts when replacing old or damaged culverts. <br />At the western end of the mine site, from west to east: <br />• The water monitoring sites were inspected, no problems were observed. <br />• Culvert C49 is outside of the disturbance boundary, it is not NECC's responsibility. <br />• Culvert C21 should be cleaned at the inlet (this is a job for a shovel rather than heavy machinery) <br />• The "old water tank" and "old substation" SAEs showed no recent disturbance. Each could be a candidate <br />for bond release. <br />• Containment 2 was fine, but is not shown on map 14. It should be included on the redrawn map. Non- <br />coal waste should be cleared from the adjacent ditch. <br />• The upstream section of armored ditch D28 exists in the natural drainage beside the west fan, as drawn on <br />map 14 dated 7/24/2012, although many of the features shown on this map don't exist on the ground since <br />the work approved by TR66 has not been commenced. An earlier version of map 14, dated 3/12/2012, <br />more closely reflects the physical reality on the ground in many cases, but neither version is entirely <br />comprehensive. <br />• The clean water diversion ditch above the west fan exists uphill of the position shown on the 3/12/2012 <br />map. The position of the ditch should be corrected on the redrawn map. The ditch also needs to be <br />cleared of vegetation and reshaped in places; since this was an item that was identified in the <br />inspection report of April 29, 2013, and is not the subject of a permitting action, the Division finds <br />that this is a violation for failure to maintain ditches in accordance with the approved design. This is <br />discussed further in the ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS section of this report. <br />• Culvert C23a does not exist, it should be removed from the redrawn map, (it has been removed from <br />table 21). <br />• Culvert C23 had been cleaned. There was some slight damage near the outlet, but not enough to currently <br />pose a problem. <br />• Clean water ditch D29 exists but becomes indistinct towards the flat area. D29b is —50' uphill, draining to <br />the west. The scheme works, but is not as drawn on either version of map 14. D29 currently ends in the <br />containment; the ditch should be extended to the east, into the clean water system and the redrawn <br />map should be corrected to show the positions of both ditches. <br />• Both ditches D29 and D29B need to be cleared of vegetation; since this was an item that was <br />identified in the inspection report of April 29, 2013, and is not the subject of a permitting action, the <br />Division finds that this is a violation for failure to maintain ditches in accordance with the approved <br />design. This is discussed further in the ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS section of this report. <br />• Culverts C51, C52 and C54 do not exist; the culverts should be removed from the redrawn map and <br />table 21. <br />• Although it is not clear at this stage whether the slurry injection facility will be used or not, the facility has <br />been constructed. Map 14 must be extended to show the facility, which was approved via MR95 and <br />MR102 and is shown on Map 12 (although map 12 shows two injection wells where only one exists and <br />should be corrected). MR102 describes runoff from the well pad being treated by containment 1 (it is not <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 0 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 4 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.