My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-08-21_REVISION - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2013-08-21_REVISION - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:24:02 PM
Creation date
8/22/2013 8:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/21/2013
Doc Name
Objection Letter-W D Corley
From
W.D Corley
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR40
Email Name
JHB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
west of MWNW. It is also important that this well is east of the outcrop of the upper coal seam that was <br />worked by multiple mines such as Black Diamond, and that it is below the strata of those mines. <br />PVC cap on exploratory drill hole SF -87 -07 with open slot in the cap at about ground level. <br />However, the greater problem that is not addressed is the change in the flow of Newlin Creek. The <br />Southfield Mine undermined and pillared under Newlin Creek for a distance of over 3000 feet. The only <br />subsidence monitoring point specifically for monitoring Newlin Creek, point NC, is located over a solid <br />pillar where subsidence would not be expected. Other subsidence monitoring points near Newlin Creek <br />such as point Axle and point CV have shown subsidence, and these two points are above the same <br />pillared panels that Newlin Creek also crosses. For the past several years the flow of Newlin Creek has <br />changed with large amounts of flow suddenly disappearing into the ground. This disappearance occurs <br />over a short segment of the flowline, sometimes in as short a distance as ten to fifteen feet. EFCI states <br />that this has always been the case. We state that this a dramatic change. EFCI says that the flow is <br />simply disappearing into a vast gravel alluvium. Based on the thickness of the unconsolidated layer in <br />nearby drill holes and the surface elevation difference between the surrounding areas and the Newlin <br />Creek flowline, the gravel alluvium in the creek bottom may only be a few feet thick. We say that the <br />water is disappearing into the old coal mines and the Southfield Mine (hydrogeologically connected) <br />which has been filled in the past few years far faster than any of BBA computer models. <br />Therefore, the obvious problem is trying to determine the status of the underground water levels. <br />Removal of MWNW even with its compromised obstruction would eliminate the only chance to monitor <br />the Southfield workings. To approve TR40 would have the ultimate effect of closing any further <br />investigation of Newlin Creek and whether it has been permanently diverted to discharge its flow by <br />means of the hydrogeological connections thru the coal mines and then discharge to the surface in <br />Second Alkali Creek. We would assert that MW23 and MW65 will be of no usefulness for the Newlin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.