Laserfiche WebLink
August 2013 7 103- 81640A <br />cored using water to more easily remove the cuttings and reduce dust. Circulation of cuttings and water <br />was not observed during the drilling. Upon removal of the HSA, drill cuttings were observed to be lodged <br />between the outside of the HSA and the fill, suggesting circulation was likely lost due to, and into, the <br />permeable fill. <br />To install monitoring well MW -7, the NQ corehole was abandoned due to drilling difficulties and an offset <br />boring was drilled 20 feet north of the NQ corehole using a 7'/8 -inch air -rotary roller bit to a total depth of <br />260 feet bls, where the top of the Codell sandstone was observed in the adjacent NQ corehole. Drilling <br />occurred through a string of 81/4 -inch ID HSA set at 30 feet bls to case off the fill. A diverter was installed <br />at the top of the 8'/4 -inch ID HSA to divert cuttings and dust generated from the drilling to a covered <br />roll -off. Water was not added to the air stream while drilling most of this hole to limit introduction of <br />potable water that may impact future groundwater sampling results. A notable amount of groundwater <br />was produced from a depth of about 210 to 215 feet bls, which limited dust generation during drilling of <br />the well borehole. However, at greater depths it was necessary to add water to lift the drill cuttings to the <br />surface and to clear out the borehole before setting the well. Drill cuttings were not sampled from this <br />borehole because the NQ core is representative of the encountered lithology at monitoring well MW -7. <br />3.1.4 Whole Rock Laboratory Testing <br />A total of seven whole rock samples were collected from the cuttings or core in the screened intervals of <br />each well and submitted to ACZ Laboratories for analysis. The samples were collected for analysis of <br />chemistry to help determine if the geology is contributing to elevated groundwater constituent <br />concentrations. The analysis includes a bulk chemical analysis and the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching <br />Procedure (SPLP) for the same constituents as the groundwater monitoring program. <br />At MW -5, one composite sample was collected from the split -spoon samples from the screened interval. <br />At MW -6 and MW -7, three samples each were collected from distinct rock types in contact with the well <br />screens. Results of the whole rock testing will be discussed in the Site Characterization Report to be <br />prepared after completing quarterly sampling of all seven monitoring wells in 2013. <br />3.2 Packer Testing <br />Packer injection testing of the bedrock was conducted at select intervals within the NQ corehole as part of <br />the drilling program at monitoring well MW -7. A Longyear NQ Wireline Packer was used as coring <br />progressed to evaluate in -situ hydraulic conductivity of discrete rock intervals. A total of three intervals <br />was tested - -the first between 55 and 61 feet bls (zone of first observed groundwater), the second <br />between 262 and 271 feet bls (the top section of the Codell sandstone), and the last from 251 to 271 feet <br />bls. No other packer testing was conducted because rock coring did not take place at monitoring wells <br />MW -5 (due to high groundwater yields above bedrock) and MW -6. <br />i \10 \81640a\ 0400\ gwcharwellinstallfieldrep_ 09aug13\ gwcharwellinstalifieldrep _09aug13 docx <br />Golder <br />Associates <br />