Laserfiche WebLink
List of Tables <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -1 Water Quality Comparison — Overburden Water 22 <br />(GW -N9) vs. Spoil Water (Spoil Spring) <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2 NHN Backfill Spring Predicted Impact 30 <br />on Receiving Streams <br />List of Figures <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -1 North -South Section Showing Drainage In Backfill 17 <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -1 <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -la BBA Water Consultant Report <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -1b WRS, LLC Report on Augmentation Plan <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -lc Approved Water Augmentation Plan <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -2 <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2a <br />Summary of Hydrologic Consequences <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2b <br />Flow Rates vs. TDS <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2a <br />GW -N8 Hydrograph <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2b <br />GW -N9 Hydrograph <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2c <br />Projected Draw Down <br />Hydrograph Modeling Procedures and Assumptions <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2d MODFLOW Overburden Water Level <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2e MODFLOW Draw Down <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2f Monitoring Well Water Levels <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2g Distance /Drawdown Summary <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -3 <br />NHN Mine Hydrologic Monitoring Plan <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -4 <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -4a Approved Well Permits Backfill Dewatering Wells <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -4b Approved Well Permits Active Mining Pit Dewatering "Well" <br />Revised July 2013 (MR 07) MR -0-7 <br />jw__ roved <br />n, Ju1.2 -013 <br />