2013-07-31_REVISION - C1992081 ‎(5)‎

• Permit No: C1992081
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 7/31/2013
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review No. 4
• From: DRMS
• To: Roy Karo
• Type & Sequence: TR10
• Email Name: JLE
• Email Name: SB1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215 COLORADO
Denver, Colorado 80203 P I V I S l o N o f
RECLAMATION
Phone: [phone] MINING
FAX: [phone] —&—
SAFETY
July 31, 2013
Dear Mr. Karo,
The Division received your response to Adequacy Review No. 3 for TR10 /RN4 on July 17, 2013. There are
several deficiencies in the response that will need to be addressed prior to the Division's approval of TR10 /RN4.
The items from the 3rd adequacy review are listed below and are italicized along with a description of your
response and the current status of these items.
Adequacy Review No. 3 Response Review:
Tab 03; Adjudication file
Your response to item #3 of the Division's first adequacy review letter indicates that included with your
adequacy review response letter was your most up to date copy ofpage 3 -1.1 ofAppendix 3 -1. However, only
the "Permit Area Legal Description Summary" sheet was included with the revised pages and your copy of
page 3 -1.1 was not included. Please submit your revised copy of page 3 -1.1 ofAppendix 3 -1.
Response /status: Your response letter indicates that you do not have a copy of page 3 -1.1 of
Appendix 3 -1. During the adequacy review for Permit Renewal No. 4 (RN4), there was a small
discrepancy in acreage listed on the page in question. The Division made note of this discrepancy
and indicated that this page was missing from the electronic copy of the permit. Based on your
response letter, it appears that this page is also missing from your copy of the permit. However, the
Division's hard copy of the permit included a copy of this page. Enclosed is a copy of page 3 -1.1,
please add it to your copy of the permit, it is the first page of the legal description of the original
permit area and should be included.
2. The response to item #4 of the Division's first adequacy review letter does not address the permit deficiency
the Division noted in that item. Rule 2.03.6 states, "Each application shall contain a complete and detailed
legal description of the proposed permit boundary ". Appendix 3 -1 contains a detailed legal description of
the original Hayden Gulch Loadout permit boundary but does not include a detailed legal description of the
Tie Across Haul Road. Please submit a copy of the detailed legal description for the Tie Across Haul Road
to be included in Appendix 3 -1 in order to comply with Rule 2.03.6
a. Response /status: Your response letter indicates that HGL is researching the Routt County Records
and will submit the information as soon as it is completed. At this time the Division has not received
the required information and this item is still outstanding and will need to be addressed prior to the
approval of TR10/RN4.
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
John W. Hickenlooper
Roy Karo
Governor
Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC
Mike King
P.O. Box 670
Executive Director
37796 Routt County Road 53
Loretta Pineda
Hayden, Colorado 81639
Director
RE: Hayden Gulch Loadout; C- 1992 -081
Permit Renewal No. 4 (RN4) and Technical Revision No. 10; (TRIO) Adequacy Review No. 4
Dear Mr. Karo,
The Division received your response to Adequacy Review No. 3 for TR10 /RN4 on July 17, 2013. There are
several deficiencies in the response that will need to be addressed prior to the Division's approval of TR10 /RN4.
The items from the 3rd adequacy review are listed below and are italicized along with a description of your
response and the current status of these items.
Adequacy Review No. 3 Response Review:
Tab 03; Adjudication file
Your response to item #3 of the Division's first adequacy review letter indicates that included with your
adequacy review response letter was your most up to date copy ofpage 3 -1.1 ofAppendix 3 -1. However, only
the "Permit Area Legal Description Summary" sheet was included with the revised pages and your copy of
page 3 -1.1 was not included. Please submit your revised copy of page 3 -1.1 ofAppendix 3 -1.
Response /status: Your response letter indicates that you do not have a copy of page 3 -1.1 of
Appendix 3 -1. During the adequacy review for Permit Renewal No. 4 (RN4), there was a small
discrepancy in acreage listed on the page in question. The Division made note of this discrepancy
and indicated that this page was missing from the electronic copy of the permit. Based on your
response letter, it appears that this page is also missing from your copy of the permit. However, the
Division's hard copy of the permit included a copy of this page. Enclosed is a copy of page 3 -1.1,
please add it to your copy of the permit, it is the first page of the legal description of the original
permit area and should be included.
2. The response to item #4 of the Division's first adequacy review letter does not address the permit deficiency
the Division noted in that item. Rule 2.03.6 states, "Each application shall contain a complete and detailed
legal description of the proposed permit boundary ". Appendix 3 -1 contains a detailed legal description of
the original Hayden Gulch Loadout permit boundary but does not include a detailed legal description of the
Tie Across Haul Road. Please submit a copy of the detailed legal description for the Tie Across Haul Road
to be included in Appendix 3 -1 in order to comply with Rule 2.03.6
a. Response /status: Your response letter indicates that HGL is researching the Routt County Records
and will submit the information as soon as it is completed. At this time the Division has not received
the required information and this item is still outstanding and will need to be addressed prior to the
approval of TR10/RN4.
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines