Laserfiche WebLink
workings would provide little additional information and he adds, that it would be both technically and <br />economically challenging. <br />MW -NW Monitoring Program <br />Based on the Bishop - Brogden study findings and the supportive findings of the DRMS' hydrologic <br />review provided by Mike Boulay, the extensive information and data demonstrates that the MW -NW <br />monitoring well may be removed from the monitoring program without affecting the findings of the <br />groundwater monitoring program. Accordingly, this revision, TR -40, requests that the DRMS approves <br />removal of the MW -NW monitoring well from the Southfield groundwater monitoring program. <br />NOV No. CV- 2013 -002 <br />Given the in depth information and support data provided in the enclosed Bishop - Brogden hydrogeologic <br />report concerning the Southfield mine (Appendix A) as well as the DRMS' hydrologic review provided <br />by Mr. Mike Boulay which is also enclosed (Appendix B), said information and data herein submitted, <br />EFCI believes the data is more than adequate to vacate the NOV and requests the DRMS to vacate the <br />directive to: (Abatement Step No. 1:) Remove the obstruction in MW-NW or, establish a replacement <br />water monitoring well that intercepts the Southfield mine workings in the Red Arrow or Jack O' Lantern <br />coal seams as is stated in the NOV No. CV -2013 -002. <br />Concerning Abatement Step No. 2 in NOV No.CV- 2013 -002: Provide evidence to the Division that EFCI <br />has applied for a monitoring well permit with CDWR in accordance with Rule 2.03.10: <br />If TR -40 is approved, there is no need to submit an application for a monitor well permit. <br />If you have questions or require further information, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />George V atterson <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc <br />4 <br />