My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-19_REVISION - M2010049
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2013-07-19_REVISION - M2010049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:19:07 PM
Creation date
7/22/2013 7:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/19/2013
Doc Name
TR Submittal
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.AWES, LLC <br />Fort Collins, Colorado, USA <br />June 27, 2013 <br />Varra Companies <br />8120 Gage Street <br />Frederick, Colorado 80516 <br />Attn: Mr. Garrett Varra <br />RE: Shadow /Mounding Analysis <br />AWES No. 1 -3 -1320 <br />Dear Mr. Varra: <br />You have requested that I provide an opinion on possible effects that lining excavated gravel mines <br />can have on local groundwater hydrology - specifically shadow and mounding effects created by the <br />presence of a low permeability barrier. My opinion is that lining active or inactive gravel mines will <br />deflect groundwater around the barrier, but hydraulic gradients changes at any distance away from <br />the barrier will be insignificant. My rational for this opinion is provided below. <br />Varra Companies, Inc., (Varra) has two lined pits used for water storage that were lined in 2003 (Pit <br />112) and 2010 (Pit 110). The method of lining was compacting several feet of clay and shale bedrock <br />on the side walls of the pits, thus creating a low permeability liner. Varra installed 13 monitoring <br />wells at each of these locations and obtained water levels on a periodic basis. Pit 110 consists of two <br />lined pits and Pit 112 is a single pit. The locations of these pits are depicted on Figure 1. The <br />monitoring well locations are depicted on Plates 1 through 4, which are included in Attachments A <br />and B. <br />In order to evaluate the effects of low permeability liners on the local groundwater hydrology, I used <br />the geo- statistical model Surfer® to evaluate groundwater flow direction and gradients in the <br />vicinity of the pits. I input water level data obtained from the monitoring wells for the months of <br />January and July 2012, at each location. I chose these months to evaluate possible changes that <br />might occur from irrigation returns in the vicinity of the pits. After the model runs were competed, I <br />used a vector analysis to depict variation in gradient and flow direction. Model runs for Pits 112 and <br />110 are presented in Attachments A and B, respectively. <br />A review of both Attachments show that groundwater is being deflected around the pits, but the <br />changes in gradients are so minor the model also predicts that groundwater will flow through the <br />pits as well - this indicates the liners are competent and that there is little to no hydraulic <br />connection between the aquifer and pond. For graphical purposes, I superimposed red lines that <br />represent the primary groundwater flow patterns in the vicinity of the pits. The vector analysis <br />shows very minor changes in hydraulic gradients up and down stream of the pits indicating shadow <br />and mounding are not occurring. <br />AwU-s 4809 Four Star Court, Fort Collins, CO 80524 970 -590 -3807 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.