My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:24 PM
Creation date
7/12/2013 8:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/11/2013
Doc Name
Annual Status Report July 15, 2013
From
Mark Heifner
To
DRMS
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. New soil and overburden stockpiles - No changes occurred other than to add some material <br />to the existing overburden and topsoil stockpiles. This addition was done shortly before this <br />annual report was prepared. <br />RECLAMATION ACTIVITY IN THE LAST YEAR: <br />Climatic summary of previous year - The following four pages of graphs show the climatic <br />patterns for 2012 and the first half of 2013. These data are for KDEN, the weather station at <br />Denver International Airport (DIA). As has been previously determined, the Coal Creek site, <br />on average tends to be somewhat cooler and wetter than DIA, but the overall pattern at DIA is <br />largely applicable to the specific Coal Creek area. Past examinations showed that the stations <br />surrounding Coal Creek (Bennett, Parker, and Cherry Creek Dam) were about 5 to 10 percent <br />wetter and a couple of degrees cooler than DIA. However, consistency in the differences is <br />often lacking on the annual scale with the three nearby stations showing more variation <br />between themselves than the average of the three deviates from DIA. Also, because recent <br />records from those stations are often not continuous the data set itself for each station shows <br />high variance. <br />After the intense rains on June 6 and 7, which were far more intense here than the data <br />for DIA shows, there was little precipitation until early July. The monsoon was weak in 2012 <br />with only occasional heavy storms separated by long periods of intense heat and low humidity. <br />Early August saw a couple of moderate rainstorms, but as was true for the entire Denver <br />region, August was intensely hot and dry with many records broken. September was a bit of a <br />relief from the intense drought conditions of August, but temperatures were still often well <br />above normal and precipitation scant. October had two good snowstorms (Oct 12 -14 and 24- <br />25), but temperatures remained above normal for the most part. In November there was a good <br />snowstorm on the 10`h and in December there were a few small snows followed by a true <br />White Christmas. But temperatures remained generally above normal until December 25 <br />through 31 when an intense cold spell settled in over the urban corridor. With the exception of <br />January 11 -15, January was above normal in temperatures and near normal in precipitation. <br />From February 20 through May 8 precipitation was unusually abundant and temperatures were <br />generally near normal to below normal. April saw a considerable amount of wet snow with <br />good melting that provided a strong charging of the soil in preparation for the coming <br />summer. However, between about May 20 and June 15 much of what was gained in moisture <br />in the wet March and April was lost and precipitation returned to below normal. However, <br />2013 has been much more favorable than 2012 which saw, on the whole, above normal <br />temperatures and a moisture deficit for the year of nearly 5 inches, which is only about 60% of <br />normal precipitation. Couple that with above normal temperatures during the growing season <br />and it is no wonder severe drought was present at the start of 2013. The wet and cool to cold <br />spring of 2013 helped to relieve some of the deficit, but 2011 was also a deficit year. Thus the <br />long term condition is consistent with this area being classified as abnormally dry to moderate <br />drought by mid June 2013. By late June the national drought monitor map showed this area <br />shifted from abnormally dry to moderate drought. <br />On the whole this is not a good growth environment to conduct quality revegetation <br />work. However, vegetation already well established, if composed of drought tolerant species, <br />Status report for 2013 due July 15, 2013 Page 6 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.