My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:24 PM
Creation date
7/12/2013 8:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/11/2013
Doc Name
Annual Status Report July 15, 2013
From
Mark Heifner
To
DRMS
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wet April and early May which charged deeper soils with moisture fairly well. That has <br />allowed the spurge to show more vigor, but it does not appear that the amount of <br />spurge has actually increased significantly. In fact, because the grass is also so much <br />stronger this year, spurge may have actually declined slightly. <br />Tamarix control, begun six years ago, appeared to have reached its goal of eradication. <br />However, on a June 25 trip to that area to treat some Canada thistle that was <br />introduced in the 2012 flood, a single three foot tall Tamarix was found and was <br />treated. No others were found on the June 19 or June 25 inspections. <br />The intense stream flows in early June 2012 undoubtedly had an impact on weed <br />intensity and distribution. One of the areas heavily impacted was the location of the <br />Tamarix population. It is beneficial that the population of Tamarix had been reduced <br />prior to this flood event or this species would have likely been spread far down the <br />riparian corridor and therefore even more difficult to control. However, if there were <br />any remaining Tamarix that were uprooted and carried downstream or dormant seed <br />was in the soil, this species may have actually expanded its distribution. This is not <br />likely, but because it is possible, this species should be watched for between the South <br />Lowland and at least the confluence of Coal Creek and the East Valley drainage. <br />The presence of Cheatgrass or Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) is well known on this <br />site. This year, because of the wet spring, this annual grass is very abundant in all areas <br />of the site. Any conditions, such as a wet spring, that favor the growth of annuals will <br />also favor this tenacious and difficult to control species. That is certainly the case this <br />year. And with such a robust growth the seed bank will be well replenished making up <br />for any declines due to seed mortality in the previous dry years when this species was <br />far less abundant. <br />In the damaged streambed on the south end another weed was found that had never <br />been found in this area before. One small patch of Canada thistle was found during the <br />inspection for Tamarix. This was treated on June 25 and a few other small patches <br />were found nearby. No others were found in the area, but, like Tamarix, now that this <br />species has arrived it will need to be watched for closely and controlled quickly. This <br />species undoubtedly arrived with the flood waters and must have come from a <br />considerable distance upstream. Prior examinations of the stream channel upstream <br />from this area never noted the presence of this species. Thus, this species may have <br />come from Elbert County or even Douglas County and was transported miles <br />downstream into this area. It is important to control this species quickly as it can <br />spread easily and once well established can be difficult to eradicate. <br />B. New weed species: No new species have been noted, other than the Canada <br />thistle arrival noted above. This species is present in small numbers elsewhere, <br />but finding it in the stream channel itself is a first. That said, the thistle was <br />growing in a rather sandy, dry spot that probably provides some access to <br />groundwater without flooding the roots and rhizomes. Bull and musk thistle <br />control, and similar species as well, has been effective in reducing that <br />Status report for 2013 due July 15, 2013 Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.