My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:24 PM
Creation date
7/12/2013 8:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/11/2013
Doc Name
Annual Status Report July 15, 2013
From
Mark Heifner
To
DRMS
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
previously had now blended in with the surrounding land and the pit location was indistinguishable <br />even though apparent in the original photograph. The Division released the exploration bond and <br />ruled the backhoe pits had been adequately reclaimed. In some instances it was reasoned that if one <br />cannot even find the location of the pit then it must be reclaimed. <br />With respect to the reclamation of land at this site, the experience with the backhoe pits is important. <br />It shows that in a period of 5 to 10 years a disturbance becomes invisible due to the re- establishment <br />of the original vegetation. Thus, quick replacement of the original soil and careful grading can restore <br />the original vegetation within a decade. In reclamation terms, that is quite rapid. However, <br />extrapolation of these results to mining disturbances must be done with care. <br />The exploration pits are small and the mining areas are large. The original soil was quickly replaced <br />on exploration pits while stockpiling of soil for one to five years is often the rule with mining pits. <br />Nevertheless, existing reclaimed mining areas are returning to a vegetation composition and structure <br />that is similar to the undisturbed grasslands, after taking into account topographic and habitat <br />characteristics. No "new style" reclamation has had as long to develop as was allowed for the <br />exploration pits and therefore no conclusions can be drawn as to how long it would take 20 acres to <br />achieve the same quality of revegetation seen on a 150 square foot exploration site. However, the <br />patterns of development of the reclamation in mining areas and exploration pits appears to be similar <br />and it is therefore hopeful that the mining areas will achieve a similar quality of vegetation to what <br />originally existed there, provided the post mining environment is the same as that which was there <br />prior to mining. If topography is significantly altered then what will result may not be like what was <br />there before, but it will likely be some other natural vegetation community that can be found on <br />similar sites elsewhere on the property. <br />Following are a few selected photographic pages from the reclamation report submitted as a part of <br />the exploration notice of intent release request. The full set can be found in the actual report, a copy of <br />which should be found in the Land Board's files. <br />WEED STATUS: <br />General overview of weed status on site: Weeds remain a problem throughout this site <br />and that is not expected to change anytime soon. Many of the weed populations are deeply <br />entrenched on this land and have become that way simply because of the long life they have <br />had here and the continued presence of suitable habitat to allow their persistence. However, <br />due to control efforts and increased vegetation density, the weed problem, in general, is not <br />nearly as severe as it was when overgrazing was the rule. <br />A. Status of species that have been present in the past: Spurge density has continued <br />to decrease in the past few years due to robust expansion of grasses and the <br />competition they provide. However, they are still a serious problem in many areas and <br />have been very difficult to control where they are living in a favorable habitat. <br />Interestingly, spurge is not a common problem on mining or reclamation areas. <br />Individuals can be found, but they seem to rarely increase in cover. There is a bit of an <br />illusion this year that spurge has once again increased markedly. This is caused by the <br />Status report for 2013 due July 15, 2013 Page 11 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.