My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-09_REVISION - C1981010 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2013-07-09_REVISION - C1981010 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:20 PM
Creation date
7/10/2013 12:06:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/9/2013
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IX. Coal Mine Waste <br />No specific approvals are granted to the applicant under this section. <br />X. Backfilling and Grading <br />Backfilling and grading is discussed under Section 3.5 of Vol. III of the permit <br />application. <br />The Division previously approved the applicant's request for additional time for <br />backfilling and grading following coal removal in a contour strip mine. A detailed <br />written analysis under 2.05.4(2)(c) has demonstrated that additional time is necessary. <br />The applicant is bonded for a maximum of four (4) spoil ridges at any time within <br />each pit area. Reclamation has historically been, and is proposed to be, completed at <br />approximately the same rate as the disturbance of new ground. (4.14. 1) <br />In the review of Trapper's application for a permit in 1981, the applicant indicated that <br />the post- mining topography cannot be absolutely predicted in advance. Consequently, <br />the Division (then the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division) attached the <br />Stipulation number 10 to the permit. In the November 6, 2000 midterm permit review <br />the stipulation was terminated because it duplicated a permit requirement. The post - <br />mining topography map (annual reclamation map) required by stipulation 10 is a permit <br />requirement in section 3.5.3 of the permit. <br />See the Midterm 2000 review document for basis of termination. <br />XI. Revegetation <br />The Division previously approved Trapper's revegetation plan as set forth in Section 3.6, <br />Vol. III of the permit application. <br />The applicant will use introduced species in the reclamation seed mix. The <br />applicant has submitted information which shows that the introduced species are <br />desirable and necessary to achieve the approved post- mining land use, and are not <br />poisonous or noxious (4.15.2). In conjunction with Trapper's years of reclamation <br />experience, Trapper has reduced the number of introduced species in their seed <br />mixes. The seed mix presented in the 2006 Annual Report for both the Range Sites <br />A & B reduced the more aggressive rhizomatous wheatgrass species while the <br />amount of Beardless bluebunch wheatgrass was increased and Indian ricegrass was <br />added to the seed mix. The seed mix adjustment was found to be acceptable. <br />2. Methods to measure herbaceous cover and production, species diversity, and woody <br />plant density are discussed in section 4.4.1 of Volume IV of the permit application. <br />The cover standards are based on cover which will keep soil loss, due to rill and <br />sheet erosion, to less than 4 tons per acre per year based on the application of the <br />Universal Soil Loss Equation. These standards call for a 52% effective cover on <br />Trapper Mine 31 July 9, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.