My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2013-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:21:52 PM
Creation date
7/8/2013 1:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/1/2013
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings (PR8)
From
DRMS
To
Blue Mountain Energy, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
ZTT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
adjacent area. The permittee's alluvial valley floor analysis is contained in Section ILD of <br />Vol. 2 of the permit application. <br />Below is a detailed consideration of the alluvial valley floor potential of each of the <br />following three drainages: Red Wash, Scullion Gulch and the White River. <br />Red Wash <br />Water Availability Criteria Artificial Flood Irrigation <br />The permittee estimated the potential average annual water yield from Red Wash <br />drainage basin using Grunsky's Formula (Grunsky 1908, Sellars, 1965; see bibliography <br />in permit application). The estimate indicates that an average of 2,090 acre feet of water <br />could be made available annually in Red Wash. This corresponds to approximately 0.32 <br />inches of runoff, which is about 3.5 percent of the annual precipitation falling on the area. <br />Actual measurements of flow on Red Wash have been made using a crest stage gage <br />station located at the mouth of the basin. With the crest stage gage approach towards <br />stream monitoring, only peak flows that occur between monitoring intervals are recorded. <br />Flows that occur at less than peak flow during any one monitoring interval will not be <br />recorded. The crest gage method is, therefore, useful for recording peak events only; the <br />method has limited application for determining duration of flow, and consequently for <br />flow volumes which occur during the monitoring interval. <br />The results of the crest gage monitoring efforts on Red Wash indicate that flow is almost <br />entirely in response to snowmelt and storm rainfall events. A total of six runoff events <br />were recorded during the two year inventory period conducted by the permittee. Events <br />that occurred during the fall and summer months resulted from thunderstorm activity; <br />however, peak flows during the year were greatest during the spring as a result of <br />snowmelts. The largest event recorded for Red Wash during the inventory period was <br />240 cfs, which was generated as a result of late winter snowmelt. Due to the nature and <br />intent of crest gage type flow monitoring, it has limited usefulness for identifying water <br />availability criteria necessary for alluvial valley floor interpretation. Therefore, the most <br />useful information supplied by the permittee for AVF purposes is the estimation of <br />average annual streamflow calculated through Grunsky's formula. The amount of water <br />available annually, as estimated through Grunsky's method, indicates that Red Wash <br />further qualifies as a potential alluvial valley floor. <br />In response to requirements for additional information (Stipulation No. 8), the permittee <br />prepared and submitted a report entitled "Red Wash Drainage Basin Alluvial Valley <br />Floor Study" to the Division on July 23, 1983. The emphasis of this report was to <br />provide additional detailed information on the characteristics of the alluvial body and the <br />availability of sufficient water to support agricultural activities. Based on the information <br />contained in the report and information supplied to the Division by the Meeker Office of <br />the Soil Conservation Service regarding regional flood irrigation practices, the Division <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.