My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2013-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:21:52 PM
Creation date
7/8/2013 1:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/1/2013
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings (PR8)
From
DRMS
To
Blue Mountain Energy, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
ZTT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
refuse disposal area will be a maximum of 120 acres at any one time. All <br />runoff from the disturbed area will be routed to properly sized sediment <br />ponds. <br />Subsidence from underground mine workings could potentially impact both <br />Red Wash and Scullion Gulch. The effect on Red Wash is of greatest <br />importance as it drains approximately 122 square miles at the location where <br />undermining will occur. Although predictions indicate that maximum <br />vertical subsidence could approach six feet, large crevasses or collapse of the <br />surface should not occur due to the fact that there is approximately 600 to <br />1200 feet of overburden material above the coal seam in that area. <br />Furthermore, the swelling of shale and overburden from the caved roof <br />should effectively fill the open mine cavity. An ongoing monitoring program <br />was implemented to detect subsidence on the first longwall panel and first <br />room - and - pillar section to be mined during the initial years of production. <br />The permittee originally predicted that tension cracks from subsidence may <br />develop in formations directly underlying Red Wash and that these cracks <br />may extend upwards for tens of feet. These cracks were predicted to be of <br />limited extent; therefore, a minimal amount of surface water was predicted to <br />be siphoned into the cracks. The permittee predicted that the sediment <br />accumulating in the cracks and clay in the overburden would ultimately seal <br />the tension cracks from the surface inflow. <br />Continued monitoring of Red Wash has confirmed the permittee's <br />predictions. As projected, subsidence in Red Wash initially resulted in water <br />ponding in the stream - bottom. The high content of silt and clay carried by <br />Red Wash rapidly fills these stream - bottom ponds and seals any cracks that <br />formed in the alluvium as a result of the subsidence. Water continues to flow <br />in the surface channel at Red Wash while piezometric levels in the basal <br />alluvial gravel have dropped, indicating that the basal alluvium is not <br />recharged by surface flow infiltration. <br />Minimal subsidence impacts are expected in Scullion Gulch, similar to those <br />observed in Red Wash. The overburden under Scullion Gulch is less than <br />that of Red Wash. Tension cracks could cause several stock ponds in <br />Scullion Gulch basin to lose impounded water. Although the stock ponds are <br />normally dry, a loss of water could occur where water is present as a result of <br />damage to the dams or pond bottom that would allow seepage loss. Prior to <br />the advancement of mining that could potentially impact the ponds, <br />monitoring is required to be initiated, and the ponds repaired or replaced by <br />the operator if water retention capability of the ponds is diminished due to <br />subsidence. The operator will haul water for stock in the event of pond repair <br />or construction. <br />2. Ground Water Impacts <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.