Laserfiche WebLink
M -1985-112 — Loloff Construction, Inc. — Loloff Pit — Technical Revision Request No. 1 <br />July 3, 2013 <br />IM <br />Earth Moving Equipment <br />Dozers, loaders, scrapers, excavators, and compactors will be used for mining and earth moving <br />operations. <br />Miscellaneous Equipment <br />Dewatering pumps, electrical trailer, generator trailer, small portable generators and watering trucks <br />will be used as needed. <br />As mining progresses, topsoil and overburden will be stripped with scrapers to expose the aggregate <br />product below. All soil and overburden material will be used on -site for reclamation; so long -term <br />stockpiling of these materials is not anticipated. Overburden stockpiles will be located within the <br />proposed mining area and placed so that they do not impede potential floodwaters. The stockpiles will <br />be placed outside the floodplain where possible. <br />Mining of the aggregate will progress down to the underlying bedrock. Since reclamation will occur <br />concurrently with mining, it is not anticipated that bedrock material will be stockpiled long -term prior to <br />use if it is used in the reclamation slopes. <br />During mining and at the completion of reclamation, the mining face will have a 3HAV slope. The <br />aggregate material will be temporarily stockpiled near the portable plant site outside the floodplain <br />where possible until mining has progressed where stockpiles as well as the portable plant site can be <br />placed below the existing grade within the mining boundary. <br />Loloff Construction, Inc. recently received an inspection report from you regarding the dewatering of the <br />Loloff Pit and we addressed the complaint from Mr. and Mrs. Lary Monroe. Since that time we have <br />included calculations to estimate the effects of the dewatering. <br />The methodology presented in "Groundwater and Wells - Second Edition" by Fletcher G. Driscoll, for <br />wells in an unconfined aquifer that are pumped at a constant rate and have reached equilibrium <br />conditions, was used to estimate the limits of the cone of depression /radius of influence (Equation 9.1). <br />Attached are excerpts of this reference that give the details of the methodology used and a figure <br />showing the typical hydraulic conductivity values for soils of this type in an unconfined aquifer (Figure <br />5.14). <br />The cone of depression /radius of influence from the mining limits has been estimated using the known <br />pumping rate for the mining dewatering activities, the known depth of dewatering from the normal <br />groundwater level, an estimated radius of the pit that the mining perimeter of those phases represents, <br />and an estimated value of hydraulic conductivity for the type of soils found in this aquifer. <br />The cone of depression /radius of influence was estimated for two conditions: <br />Full depth dewatering of the pit with no aquifer recharge and the following assumptions: <br />A constant dewatering pumping rate = 3,000 gpm <br />Dewatering depth = 37 ft <br />Radius of the pit = 600 ft <br />A hydraulic conductivity value of 1000 gpd /sq -ft was assumed for the soil types found <br />on this site. The inflow to the pit through the mining slopes was assumed to be supplied <br />solely by the groundwater present in the aquifer, hence the full hydraulic conductivity <br />value of 1000 gpd /sq -ft was used. <br />v M 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D • Fort Lupton CO 80621 • Ph: 303 - 857 -6222 • Fax: 303 - 857 -6224 <br />