2013-07-03_REVISION - M1985112 ‎(3)‎

• Permit No: M1985112
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 7/3/2013
• Doc Name: TR Submittal
• From: Loloff Construction, Inc.
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: TR1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Table 3 - Pseudo - Static Condition Slope Stability Analysis Results
Description
Calculated
Factor
Of Safety
Required Minimum
Factor Of Safety
Case North EQ — North Property Line
1.27
1.0
Case South EQ — South Property Line
1.40
1.0
Case East EQ — Existing Balsam Avenue
ROW
1.16
1.0
Case West EQ — West Property Line
1.32
1.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Case North - The resulting safety factor of 1.74 exceeds the SEO minimum
requirement of 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor
of 1.27 is above the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to
earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 50 feet from the north property line is
satisfactory.
Case South - The resulting safety factor of 2.08 exceeds the SEO minimum
requirement of 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor
of 1.40 is above the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to
earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 50 feet from the south property line is
satisfactory.
Case East - The resulting safety factor of 1.58 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement
of 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.16 is
above the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake
loading. The proposed setback of 50 feet from the existing ROW is satisfactory.
Case West - The resulting safety factor of 1.83 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement
of 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.32 is
above the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake
loading. The proposed setback of 50 feet from the west property line is satisfactory.
- Loloff Construction, Inc. - Loloff Pit
JKT Consulting, Inc. Slope Stability Analysis
id I
Page 4