My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-01_PERMIT FILE - X201322801 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
X201322801
>
2013-07-01_PERMIT FILE - X201322801 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:21:54 PM
Creation date
7/1/2013 2:30:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X201322801
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/1/2013
Doc Name
BLM Environmental Assessment (DOI-BLM-CO-S050-2013-0027 EA)
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BLM Uncompahgre Field Office Sunset Trail Area Coal Exploration Plan EA <br />3.16.2 Environmental Consequences <br />3.16.2.1 Proposed Action <br />Direct and Indirect Effects <br />Surface disturbance may be visible, including temporary roads and drilling pads because of <br />associated vegetation removal on approximately 30 acres. These features, however, should not be <br />visible from public travelways due to the distance from existing publicly accessible travelways, and <br />topographic and vegetative screening. Use of the lease stipulation for visual resources will further <br />reduce visual impacts. <br />Cumulative Effects <br />Reasonably foreseeable activities could result in cumulative impacts on visual resources when <br />combined with other vegetation and ground disturbing projects affecting form, line, color, texture, <br />and pattern of the surrounding area. The heights, type, and color of potential development, together <br />with their placement with respect to local topography, short duration of features on the surface and <br />application of stipulation are factors that would contribute to minimizing the extent of visual <br />intrusion on the landscape. <br />3.16.2.2 No Action <br />Under the No Action Alternative, there would be no disturbance and therefore no impacts on visual <br />quality. <br />4.0 INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW <br />The following federal agency personnel have contributed to and provided interdisciplinary review <br />of this environmental assessment. <br />Name <br />Title <br />Agency <br />Area of Responsibility <br />Chad Meister <br />Resource Specialist <br />BLM <br />Air Quality <br />Ryan Taylor <br />Paonia District Geologist <br />USFS <br />Geology /Document review <br />Niccole Mortenson <br />Engineering and Minerals NEPA <br />Specialist <br />USFS <br />Over all document review <br />Levi Broyles <br />Paonia District Ranger <br />USFS <br />Review for concurrence <br />Desty Dyer <br />Mining Engineer <br />BLM <br />Mining/Document review <br />Christina Reed <br />BLM Colorado State Office Planning <br />and Environmental Coordinator <br />BLM <br />NEPA review <br />Teresa Pfifer <br />Lands & Minerals Supervisor <br />BLM <br />Document review <br />Bruce Krickbaum <br />Uncompahgre Field Office Planning <br />& Environmental Coordinator <br />BLM <br />Document review <br />Gina Jones <br />Southwest District Planning & <br />Environmental Coordinator <br />BLM <br />Document review <br />June 2013 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.