2013-06-26_REVISION - C1992081 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: C1992081
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 6/26/2013
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review No 3
• From: DRMS
• To: Roy Karo - Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC
• Type & Sequence: TR10
• Email Name: JLE
• Email Name: SB1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215 C O L O RA D O
Denver, Colorado 80203 P I V I S l o N o f
RECLAMATION
Phone: [phone]
MINING
FAX: [phone] —&—
SAFETY
June 26, 2013
Dear Mr. Karo,
The Division received your response to the Adequacy Review No. 1 and No. 2 for TR10 on May 1", 2013. There
are several deficiencies in the response that will need to be addressed prior to the Division's approval of TR10.
Adequacy Review No. I Response Review:
Tab 03; Adiudication file
1. Your response to item #3 of the Division's first adequacy review letter indicates that included with your
adequacy review response letter was your most up to date copy of page 3 -1.1 of Appendix 3 -1. However,
only the "Permit Area Legal Description Summary" sheet was included with the revised pages and your
copy of page 3 -1.1 was not included. Please submit your revised copy of page 3 -1.1 of Appendix 3 -1.
2. The response to item #4 of the Division's first adequacy review letter does not address the permit
deficiency the Division noted in that item. Rule 2.03.6 states, "Each application shall contain a complete
and detailed legal description of the proposed permit boundary ". Appendix 3 -1 contains a detailed legal
description of the original Hayden Gulch Loadout permit boundary but does not include a detailed legal
description of the Tie - Across Haul Road. Please submit a copy of the detailed legal description for the
Tie - Across Haul Road to be included in Appendix 3 -1 in order to comply with Rule 2.03.6.
Tab 20; Reve2etation Plan
In regards to the areas to be revegetated to cropland within the Tie - Across Haul Road corridor, the
response to item 46 of the Division's first adequacy review letter does not address the permit deficiency
the Division noted in that item. Rule 2.05.4(2)(e), includes the requirements necessary for a revegetation
plan that must be included within a permit. Tab 20 does not include a plan for revegetation for Cropland.
Rule 4.15.1(2)(c) indicates if the approved post mining land use is cropland, planting of the crops
normally grown in the area will meet the requirements for establishing an effective and permanent
vegetation cover on the disturbed land. The Division does not object to using small grains to reclaim
these areas, but there needs to be a revegetation plan for these areas that meets the requirements of Rule
2.05.4(2)(e).
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
John W. Hickenlooper
Roy Karo
Governor
Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC
Mike King
P.O. Box 670
Executive Director
37796 Routt County Road 53
Loretta Pineda
Hayden, Colorado 81639
Director
RE: Hayden Gulch Loadout; C- 1992 -081
Permit Renewal No. 4 (RN4) and Technical Revision No. 10; (TRIO) Adequacy Review No. 3
Dear Mr. Karo,
The Division received your response to the Adequacy Review No. 1 and No. 2 for TR10 on May 1", 2013. There
are several deficiencies in the response that will need to be addressed prior to the Division's approval of TR10.
Adequacy Review No. I Response Review:
Tab 03; Adiudication file
1. Your response to item #3 of the Division's first adequacy review letter indicates that included with your
adequacy review response letter was your most up to date copy of page 3 -1.1 of Appendix 3 -1. However,
only the "Permit Area Legal Description Summary" sheet was included with the revised pages and your
copy of page 3 -1.1 was not included. Please submit your revised copy of page 3 -1.1 of Appendix 3 -1.
2. The response to item #4 of the Division's first adequacy review letter does not address the permit
deficiency the Division noted in that item. Rule 2.03.6 states, "Each application shall contain a complete
and detailed legal description of the proposed permit boundary ". Appendix 3 -1 contains a detailed legal
description of the original Hayden Gulch Loadout permit boundary but does not include a detailed legal
description of the Tie - Across Haul Road. Please submit a copy of the detailed legal description for the
Tie - Across Haul Road to be included in Appendix 3 -1 in order to comply with Rule 2.03.6.
Tab 20; Reve2etation Plan
In regards to the areas to be revegetated to cropland within the Tie - Across Haul Road corridor, the
response to item 46 of the Division's first adequacy review letter does not address the permit deficiency
the Division noted in that item. Rule 2.05.4(2)(e), includes the requirements necessary for a revegetation
plan that must be included within a permit. Tab 20 does not include a plan for revegetation for Cropland.
Rule 4.15.1(2)(c) indicates if the approved post mining land use is cropland, planting of the crops
normally grown in the area will meet the requirements for establishing an effective and permanent
vegetation cover on the disturbed land. The Division does not object to using small grains to reclaim
these areas, but there needs to be a revegetation plan for these areas that meets the requirements of Rule
2.05.4(2)(e).
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines