Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />canyon walls near the mine on a seasonal basis, and in some of the unconsolidated valley fill. Little <br />Collom Gulch is ephemeral, and did not produce measurable flow during the baseline hydrologic <br />monitoring efforts described in Section 2.04.7. Very little water is found in the current active mine; and, <br />based on existing geological and hydrological evidence, the areas to be mined provide no or only minor <br />amounts of recharge to local surface water features. <br />Geomorphic Characteristics <br />Tetra Tech's (2005) investigation included mapping unconsolidated deposits in the Collom permit <br />expansion area, using published and unpublished geologic maps and ground reconnaissance. These <br />deposits are shown in Figure 1 of Exhibit 7, Item 24. Much of the mapped deposits contained substantial <br />proportions of colluvium and /or sheetwash. Valley bottoms elsewhere within the permit expansion area <br />were very narrow and historically uncultivated, or contained significant amount of colluvium or <br />sheetwash. The source material for the valley fills was primarily erosion and deposition of loess, leading <br />to a loamy soil texture which supports more lush vegetation than adjacent uplands, even absent sub - <br />irrigation. Most floodplains in the area are generally extremely narrow (less than 20 feet), have been <br />severely down -cut, and /or contain too much topographic relief in the form of slopes to be considered <br />capable of being irrigated. Due to downcutting, flooding does not extend beyond the limits of the incised <br />channel. <br />Flood Irrigation and Agricultural Activities <br />Section 2.04.3 contains a description and map of agricultural activities in the permit and adjacent area. <br />The Premining and Postmining Land Use Map (Map 17) shows that the historic pre- mining land use of <br />the area has been generally undeveloped rangeland. Based on repeated field investigations, there is no <br />evidence of historical flood irrigation in the Collom permit expansion area. However, documentation <br />exists indicating several small parcels totaling approximately 24 acres and located along the West Fork of <br />Jubb Creek were historically used for hay production. Additional exceptions to undeveloped range land <br />in the permit area include the presence of equipment staging areas, small structures, reservoirs, roads, and <br />stream crossings. Historically, there has not been a developed water supply for agricultural activities in <br />the potentially- affected drainages; however, some limited irrigation is conducted in the floodplain of <br />Wilson Creek, outside the proposed southern permit boundary above areas downcut during the mid - <br />1980's. Prior to the mid 1980's, flood irrigation did occur northeast of the current Gossard Loadout <br />factilities across Highway 17, outside Colowyo's permit boundary, away from any prior mine related <br />activities or planned disturbance associated with the Collom Haul Road. The area of concern surrounding <br />the Gossard Loadout Facility was bypassed historically in order to apply irrigation water downstream in <br />the bottom lands outside the current permit boundary. There is no evidence the area around the Gossard <br />Loadout Facility was ever irrigated in the past. Irrigation diversion points, irrigation canals, and <br />topography are shown on Map l OB. These areas are well outside the subject drainages of Collom Gulch, <br />Little Collom Gulch, and Jubb Creek. <br />Subirrigation <br />Depths to groundwater for the area have been reported to occur in valley fill (floodplain) materials <br />anywhere between 9 feet below ground surface (bgs) along West Fork Jubb Creek, to greater than 47 feet <br />bgs within Little Collom Gulch. The historical average Depth to Water at the Gossard Well directly <br />Northeast of the Gossard Loadout Facilitites is approximately 21 feet (209 Annual Reclamation Report) <br />Tetra Tech (2005) concluded that such depths to groundwater are too great to allow for agriculturally <br />significant subirrigation. Further information on groundwater occurrence is provided in Section 2.04.7. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 145 Revision Date: 9/28/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />