My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (82)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-04-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (82)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:23 PM
Creation date
6/10/2013 10:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/10/2013
Doc Name
Operation and Reclamaiton Plans
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2.05
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />The West Fork of Jubb Creek is intermittent, and is only affected by a potential reduction in spring/seep <br />source area by construction of the Collom Lite pit. Water infiltrating into reclaimed pit and spoil areas <br />may later enter the West Fork of Jubb Creek via springs, if the elevation of the springs is below the final <br />pit outflow elevation, and if the spring is connected to a stratigraphic interval that is exposed along the <br />downgradient highwall of the reclaimed pit. The reclaimed pit outflow elevation is 7275 amsl, while the <br />potentially affected springs are either located above this elevation, or have a source stratum which falls <br />above this elevation where it intersects the highwall. Springs V 10 and V32 are located above the pit <br />outflow, at elevations 7295 and 7600, respectively (based on 25 foot contours). Spring/seep V 1 is located <br />at approximate elevation 7170, below the pit outflow, but is roughly 3200 feet from the pit disturbance <br />boundary, not accounting for the highwall side slope. VI is generally down -dip from the pit, and the <br />bedrock dips at roughly 8 percent. The spring's source layer must therefore intersect the highwall <br />approximately 256 feet (3200 x 0.08) above the spring elevation, or roughly 7426 ft amsl. This is well <br />above the pit outflow elevation. Therefore, water in contact with the overburden fill will not impact water <br />quality in the West Fork of Jubb Creek, and will instead discharge to groundwater, generally within Little <br />Collom Gulch. <br />Potential for Spoil Spring Water Discharge Impacting Downstream Areas <br />For Collom Lite, there are two separate ground water conditions in the mining area — the saturated <br />groundwater zone and the unconfined perched aquifers above the deeper zone. The saturated ground <br />water conditions exist below a depth of 7150feet (based on the 2005 WMC report). Any pitwall seepage <br />from the 7150 feet level and below is to be expected since the ground water at this depth will be coming <br />to equilibrium with the surrounding ground water levels (water table /piezometric surface) once <br />dewatering ceases. The water beneath this piezometric /water table surface will flow in a northern <br />direction at the rate of normal ground water flow for the area. Based on numerous previous studies in the <br />area, this saturated water table level is at or below the bottom elevations of the creeks and gulches in the <br />area of Collom Lite. This creates an outflow from the creeks to the ground water. <br />With respect to spoil water quality, current water, rock, and soil quality analyses predominantly show a <br />basic (a.k.a. base) environment, i.e., a pH above 7.0. This chemical environment has been present in this <br />area since quality testing was initiated (and therefore, for some time in the past). Some adverse chemical <br />conditions have been identified in the soils and overburden analyses; however, these have been discussed <br />in the application and have been adequately handled by Colowyo in the past. <br />After the water begins to accumulate and if any water starts to be discharged from the pit spoils, it will be <br />in contact with spoil that is not geologically or chemically different from the surrounding in situ material. <br />Thus, no significant change to water quality should occur while in this basic environment beyond a <br />moderate potential increase in total dissolved solids. Given the long time frame involved, the small <br />expected contributory volume that could conceivably contribute to springs /seeps /bedrock groundwater <br />resources and dilution of potential moderate increases in total dissolved solids concentrations observed at <br />other locations from water originating from spoil backfill areas, no significant change to local or regional <br />water quality is expected. <br />After the water is discharged (and based on current conditions) any water flow from the pit spoils will <br />either evaporate or recharge the permeable materials in Little Collom Gulch. Little or no surface flow is <br />expected in Little Collom Gulch, since no recorded surface flows have been detected in Little Collom <br />Gulch indicating that any surface water is readily absorbed into the permeable material of Little Cullom <br />Gulch. In addition, ground water levels in Little Collom Gulch are in excess of 10 feet below ground <br />surface based on geotechnical and hydrologic studies in the area. Thus, this discharge water will i°itermix <br />with the in situ ground water, which will further dilute the discharge water. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 141 Revision Date: 9/28/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.