My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-04-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2016 10:40:13 AM
Creation date
6/7/2013 1:38:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/10/2013
Doc Name
Fish and Willdife Resources Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2.04.11
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />Actual acreage impact to mule deer in the disturbance boundary: <br />- Winter concentration area: 1167.66 acres <br />Actual acreage impact to mule deer in the permit boundary: <br />- Migration corridor: 1861.68 acres <br />- Winter Concentration area: 16170.37 <br />2.04.11(4)Threatened and Endangered Wildlife Species <br />This section addresses the potential for special status fish and wildlife species to occur within the Collom <br />permit expansion area. Special status species include Federally Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate <br />species, State Threatened and Endangered Species, and species designated as sensitive by the BLM Little <br />Snake Field Office. The common name, scientific name, listing status, habitat and potential for <br />occurrence in the Collom permit expansion area are presented in Table 2.04.11 -19. <br />The most recent USFWS Endangered Species list (July 2010) was reviewed for Moffat and Rio Blanco <br />Counties. There were nine threatened, endangered, or candidate species that potentially occur in the <br />Collom permit expansion area based on county occurrence. Federally endangered species include four <br />fish species (bonytail chub, Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, razorback sucker) and two mammals <br />(black- footed ferret, gray wolf). Federally threatened species include one avian species (Mexican spotted <br />owl) and one mammal (Canada lynx). The yellow - billed cuckoo and Greater Sage - grouse have been <br />identified as candidate species for federal listing. <br />Due to lack of appropriate habitat, no federally threatened or endangered species are expected to be <br />present within the Collom permit expansion area. There is also no federally designated critical habitat for <br />threatened or endangered species present in the Collom permit expansion area. Table 2.04.11 -19 and the <br />paragraphs below provide supporting information. <br />It is highly unlikely that any of the four endangered fish species would be present in the Collom permit <br />expansion area. These species occur only in large river systems, such as the Colorado River. Only two <br />small, perennial streams occur in or near the Collom permit expansion area. These four fish species are <br />also listed as either state endangered or state threatened (Table 2.04.11 -19). As described in Section <br />2.05.6(3)(b)(iii), Little Collom Gulch is ephemeral, and showed no evidence of surface flow during 18 <br />months of baseline monitoring. Elimination of springs within Little Collom Gulch will therefore have no <br />measurable effect on surface water quantity in Little Collom Gulch. There may be an effect on peak <br />flows in the West Fork of Jubb Creek, due to the elimination of recharge to three springs adjacent to the <br />Collom Lite pit, but this effect is not expected to be measurable or statistically significant. Once mining <br />has been completed and the pit has been saturated, the contributions to surface water from springs <br />originating from infiltration into the Collom Lite pit would return to normal. Other than those directly <br />eliminated by the pit, no springs are likely to be affected by the Little Collom X pit. By comparing pro - <br />mining surface flow conditions, the duration of mining activities in the area, the actual acreage proposed <br />for disturbance, utilization of "clear water" diversions to bypass progressive annual disturbance, <br />utilization of small stockponds for livestock and wildlife enhancement purposes in reclamation areas, and <br />an assumed net gain in post- mining runoff generation once the Collom expansion area is fully reclaimed, <br />Colowyo estimates an additio -ial annual water depletion of 36 ac -ft. Based on the narrative found in <br />Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iii), the impact to streams during the mining process is not expected to be <br />measureable and Colowyo could proceed forward with the stance that the Collom expansion area will iot <br />cause additional deplv.tion. However, Colowyo recognizes that the six proposed post -mine stockpo,lda <br />(found on Map 46), al,,-hough small (each < 2 au -ft.), in addition to the Little Collom Sediment Pond (19.9 <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 87 Revision Date: 9/28/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.