Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />The density of larger aspen averaged 139 trees per acre using the point- center - quarter (PCQ) method (the <br />difference between the two values was due to aspen recruitment — trees smaller than 5 feet that were not <br />recorded in the PCQ measurements). The canopy cover in the aspen community baseline study area was <br />visually estimated to average 31 percent, which is about one -half of the normal expectancy. The aspen <br />canopy cover at over half' of the sample points was substantially reduced due to the recent die -off of <br />mature trees, most likely due to the recent drought (Table 2.04.10 -42). <br />The average ground cover in the aspen community reference area was 72.05 percent with 0.0 percent <br />rock, 19.1 percent litter, and 8.85 percent bare ground exposure. Dominant plant species and their ground <br />cover percentage included: mountain brome with 16.35 percent, blue wildrye with 15.2 percent, <br />bluegrass with 5.35 percent, creepingroot violet (Viola rydbergii) with 5.15 percent, povertyweed (Iva <br />axillaris) with 4.35 percent and nettleleaf giant hyssop with 3.6 percent. Of the total plant cover, 97 <br />percent (70.05 percent average cover) was due to perennial plants (excluding noxious weeds). Annual <br />species contributed 2.8 percent and noxious weeds contributed 0.0 percent of the composition. Nine <br />perennial species contributed at least 3 percent relative cover or composition (3 percent is the typical <br />lower limit for plant diversity bond release evaluations), with three of those species being grasses, four <br />forbs, and two shrubs (Table 2.04.10 -39). <br />The average herbaceous production within the aspen reference area was 1,110 pounds per acre, oven -dry <br />weight, with 98 percent (1,092 pounds per acre) due to perennials (grasses contributing 759 pounds per <br />acre and forbs providing 332 pounds per acre) and 2 percent due to annuals (all forbs). Noxious weeds <br />were not found in or near the reference area (Table 2.04.10 -43). <br />Woody plant density in the aspen reference area was 2,710 plants per acre with dominance by <br />chokecherry (1,263 plants per acre) and mountain snowberry (549 plants per acre). The shrub lifeform <br />accounts for 77 percent (2,088 plants per acre), sub -trees account for 8 percent (220 plants per acre), and <br />trees account for 15 percent (402 per acre) of the total (Table 2.04.10 -44). <br />The density of aspen averaged 172 trees per acre using the PCQ method (again the difference between the <br />two values was due to aspen recruitment — trees smaller than 5 feet that were not recorded in the PCQ <br />measurements). The canopy cover in the reference area was visually estimated to average 32 percent <br />(Table 2.04.10 -45). <br />The comparison of the calculated t- statistic (t *) for the aspen community baseline study area and the <br />aspen reference area with the respective tabular t values indicates that in each case t* is less than t. So, it <br />can be concluded that the total vegetation ground cover and production for the aspen community baseline <br />study area is comparable (equal) to the values obtained from the aspen reference area (Table 2.04.10 -38). <br />Bottomland - As indicated on Map 4C, the bottomland community baseline study area occupies 603.4 <br />acres and occurs in the relatively flat alluvial /colluvial deposits within drainages, or the concave basins of <br />the drainage headwaters. It is an aggregate of vegetation subtypes (wetland, riparian bottom, sagebrush, <br />grassland, and occasionally mountain shrub at elevation). The wetland and riparian bottom subtypes are <br />restricted to this physiographic location, whereas the sagebrush, mountain shrub, and grassland types have <br />"invaded" from surrounding uplands to take advantage of the more mesic conditions. It generally exhibits <br />deep to very deep soils with somewhat elevated moisture levels that result from side -slope outwash, <br />varying amounts of lateral subirrigation from stream flow, flood flows, and from occasional seeps and <br />springs. Vegetation within the bottomland community grows with elevated density and productivity in <br />comparison to the adjacent uplands due to greater amount of water availability. The bottomland reference <br />site is located along Wilson Creek just external to the northeast portion of the study area and occupies <br />32.3 acres. This reference area was selected because of its easy access, low probability of future <br />disturbance, and the representative mix of sagebrush and grassland sub -types within its boundaries. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 62 Revision Date: 9/28/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />