My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-04-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2016 10:40:06 AM
Creation date
6/7/2013 1:38:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/10/2013
Doc Name
Vegetation Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2.04.10
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />If the initial minimum number of samples in each area did not provide a suitable estimate of the mean <br />(i.e., the inequality was false), additional samples were collected until the inequality (nmin < n) became <br />true. Only two areas required additional sampling (Juniper Scrub and Bottomland Baseline Areas) where <br />39 and 17 additional production samples were collected. <br />Reference Area Comparability - When reference areas are utilized as revegetation standards of success for <br />vegetation cover and production, demonstrations are required prior to permit issuance to document that <br />the selected reference areas are statistically comparable (equal) to the vegetation types for which they <br />represent. The pre- mining demonstration of reference area comparability was made using the two- tailed <br />Students t -test as indicated below. Reference area production and cover are compared at the 95 percent <br />confidence limit (alpha at 0.05 level) with the respective baseline area production and cover. The sample <br />"t" statistic (t *) is calculated as follows: <br />t * =(x, —x,)1- (S21 /n,) +(s22/n2) <br />where: <br />x, = mean of the baseline area <br />x Z = mean of the reference area <br />S = variance of the baseline area <br />s2 z = variance of the reference area <br />n = sample size for the baseline area <br />n2 = sample size for the reference area <br />The tabular "t" comparison statistic (t') is calculated as follows: <br />[(s12 /nl)ta, + (s22 /n2)ta2] l(s,2 /n, + s22 /n2) <br />where : <br />O = 0.05 level <br />Then if the inequality (t* < t'� is true, the test is passed and the baseline and reference areas can be <br />considered to be from identical populations. <br />Results <br />Detailed Vegetation Information <br />General - Six major vegetation community types were identified within the Vegetation Study Area: <br />Aspen, Sagebrush, Bottomland, Grassland, Juniper Scrub, and Mountain Shrub. Minor vegetation <br />communities and land use types included: Improved Pasture, Cultivated Land (Cropland), Disturbed <br />Areas, and Wetlands (acres of wetlands and waters of the U.S. are included under the Bottomland <br />vegetation community type). The acreage occupied by each type /subtype are indicated in Table 2.04. 10 <br />33. A vegetation community is termed minor if it is less than 10 acres in total, or it contributes 5 percent <br />or less to the total acreage. Meeting the lesser of these two criteria eliminates a vegetation type from <br />specific reclamation planning. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 60 Revision Date: 9/28/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.