My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-05-28_REVISION - M1977311 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977311
>
2013-05-28_REVISION - M1977311 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:33 PM
Creation date
6/4/2013 2:24:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977311
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/28/2013
Doc Name
AR5 FOR AM1
From
COTTER
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
DMC
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to arrive at a stable riprap size. Chart 2 in Appendix C provides a solution <br />to Equation 8 and Equation 9 using correction factor C. <br />The stability factor, SF, used in Equation 6 and Equation 9 requires <br />additional explanation. The stability factor is defined as the ratio of the <br />riprap material's critical shear stress and the average tractive force <br />exerted by the flow field. As long as the stability factor is greater than 1, <br />the critical shear stress of the material is greater than the flow induced <br />tractive stress, the riprap is considered to be stable. As mentioned <br />above, a stability factor of 1.2 was used in the development of Equation <br />6. <br />The stability factor is used to reflect the level of uncertainty in the <br />hydraulic conditions at a particular site. Equation 6 is based on the <br />assumption of uniform or gradually varying flow. In many instances, this <br />assumption is violated or other uncertainties come to bear. For example, <br />debris and /or ice impacts, or the cumulative effect of high shear stresses <br />and forces from wind and /or boat generated waves. The stability factor is <br />used to increase the design rock size when these conditions must be <br />considered. Table 1 presents guidelines for the selection of an <br />appropriate value for the stability factor. <br />Table 1. Guidelines for the Selection of Stability Factors <br />,Condition <br />Uniform flow; Straight or mildly curving reach (curve radius /channel width > 30); Impact <br />1.0 -1.2 <br />from wave action and floating debris is minimal; Little or no uncertainty in design <br />parameters. <br />Gradually varying flow; Moderate bend curvature (30 > curve radius /channel width > 10); <br />Impact from waves or floating debris moderate. <br />1.3 -1.6 <br />Approaching rapidly vary ing flow; Sharp bend curvature(10 > curve radius /channel width); <br />1.6 -2.0 <br />Significant impact potential from floating debris and /or ice; Significant wind and /or boat <br />generated waves (.30 -.61 m)); High flow turbulence; Turbulently mixing flow at bridge <br />abutments; Significant uncertainty in design parameters. <br />4.1.1.2 Application <br />Application of the relationship in Equation .6 is limited to uniform or <br />gradually varying flow conditions. That is in straight or mildly curving <br />channel reaches of relatively uniform cross section. However, design <br />needs dictate that the relationship also be applicable in nonuniform, <br />rapidly varying flow conditions often exhibited in natural channels with <br />sharp bends and steep slopes, and in the vicinity of bridge piers and <br />abutments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.