My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-04-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:10 PM
Creation date
5/21/2013 1:26:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/5/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operations and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />Because the amount of grasses (and all sod - formers) has been substantially reduced for this <br />sagebrush steppe mix, it is possible that on occasion, grass emergence may not be satisfactory for <br />erosion control or life form diversity. In such circumstances a supplemental "inter- seeding" with the <br />grassland mix may be necessary to "bolster" the grass and forb component of the community. This <br />activity is allowed under Rule 4.15.7 (5)(g). Such an inter - seeding would only occur if adequate <br />sagebrush or other shrub seedlings have emerged from the initial seeding, otherwise a "reseeding" or <br />"augmented seeding" would be mandated. Furthermore, such an inter - seeding must occur within the <br />first four years from the date of the initial seeding to avoid circumstances that would "reset the bond <br />release clock ". If "inter- seeding" is necessary on any units of land, CDRMS will be apprised in the <br />Annual Reclamation Report. <br />The high rate of seeds per square foot in the sagebrush steppe mix is simply a result of the small seed <br />size for several taxa in the mixture (e.g., sagebrush at 2,500,000 seeds / pound). The individual <br />species have been selected for their habitat forming characteristics for sage grouse during their <br />brooding period. None of the individual seeding rates are excessive given the current state of <br />knowledge, nor is the seeding rate per acre excessive for combination drill / broadcast seeding. <br />However, this mix has not been designed to ensure quick erosion control for immediate stabilization <br />of the topsoil and therefore, should not be used on slopes that exceed 10 %. Furthermore, it may need <br />to be planted intermittently (banding) with the grassland mix on long, low- gradient slopes. For <br />additional information regarding this planting technique, see the "Planting and Seeding Methods" <br />section below. <br />The introduced taxon that is included in the seed mixtures above, ( Cicer milkvetch), has been <br />retained in the mix to provide forage for both wildlife (elk and sage grouse) and livestock. <br />Furthermore, Cicer milkvetch is an excellent species for providing necessary habitat requisites for a <br />variety of insects that in turn are especially important to sage grouse broods. It is a well- documented <br />observation that insects comprise a very significant portion of young sage grouse diets. <br />Similarly, the introduced species, small burnett, has been retained in the contingency species list <br />(Table 2.05.8) owing to its well documented value to wildlife. <br />Data on reclaimed areas at Colowyo, has indicated that orchard grass is an important grass species <br />for controlling erosion and providing cover the first growing season, while decreasing subsequent <br />growing seasons. Orchard grass comprised 0.13 plants per square foot the first growing season, <br />while decreasing to less than 0.02 plants per square foot the second growing season. This indicates <br />the effectiveness of orchard grass to provide erosion control early on revegetated areas, while not <br />sustaining this vigor in later years due to increased competition and crowding by other species as <br />well as targeted selection by elk (i.e. it has been repeatedly observed in Colowyo reclamation, that <br />orchard grass plants have been selectively consumed by resident elk, and therefore, can be <br />considered highly desirable forage). <br />Also, data from Exhibit 10 indicates that Kentucky bluegrass is the most important grass species <br />contributing to the pre -mine vegetative diversity. <br />Given the aforementioned, it must be accepted that there is a place for certain introduced species in <br />Colowyo reclamation. In 2008 and thereafter, occasional use of introduced species may occur, but <br />will be limited (as indicated in the seed mixes) to specific circumstances. The only circumstances <br />where limited use of introduced species will not be followed are instances where a unit of land is <br />Rule 2 Permits 2.05 -30 Revision Date: 6/11/12 <br />Revision No.: RN -06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.