Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />maturation. If this is true. then access to these sheltered off=channel pools may be very iriportant <br />to successful spawrtine in the upper reaches of the Co'orado River. Historically, bottomlands <br />that routinely flooded durne the spring runoff period would have provided these warm <br />productive habitats; in recent years, flooded gravel pits ma}• have provided the only compazable <br />habitat. <br />Razorback Sucker <br />The razorback sucker, an endemic species unique to the Colorado River Basin, was historically <br />abundant and widely distributed «~thin warmwater reaches throughout the Colorado River Basin. <br />Historically, razorback suckers were found in the main stem Colorado River and major <br />tributaries in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, and in <br />Mexico (Ellis 1914; Hinckley 1983). Bestgen (]990) reported that this species was once so <br />numerous that it was commonly used as food by eazly settlers and, further, that commercially <br />mazketable quantities were caueht in Arizona as recently as 1949. In the Upper Basin, razorback <br />suckers were reported in the Green River to be very abundant neaz Green River, Utah, in the late <br />1800's (Jordan 1891). An account in Osmundson and Kaeding (1989) reported that residents <br />living along the Colorado River neaz Clifton, Colorado, observed several thousand razorback <br />suckers during spring runoff in the 1930's and eazly ] 940's. In the San Juan River drainage, <br />• Platania and Young (1989) relayed historical accounts of razorback. suckers ascending the <br />Animas River to Durango, Colorado, azound the turn of the century. <br />A mazked decline in populations of razorback suckers can be attributed to construction of damp <br />and reservoirs, introduction of nonnative fishes, and removal of lazge quantities of water from the <br />Colorado River system. Dams on the main stem Colorado River and its major tributaries have <br />segmented the river system and drastically altered flows, temperatures, and channel <br />geomorphology. Major changes in species composition have occurred due to the introduction of <br />numerous nonnative fishes, many of which have thrived due to man-induced changes to the <br />natural riverine system. <br />The current distribution and abundance of the razorback sucker have been significantly reduced <br />throughout the Colorado River system (McAda 1987; McAda and Wydoski 1980; Holden and <br />Stalnaker 1975; Hinckley 1983; Mazsh and Hinckley 1989; Tyus 1987). The only substantial <br />population of razorback suckers remaining, made up entirely of old adults (McCarthy and <br />Hinckley 1987), is found in Lake Mohave; however, they do not appear to be successfully <br />recruiting. While limited numbers of razorback suckers persist in other locations in the Lower <br />Colorado River, they aze considered raze or incidental and may be continuing to decline. <br />In the Upper Basin, above Glen Canyon Dam, razorback suckers aze found in limited numbers in <br />bo:h len:ic and lotic environments. The :.:rgest popula[ion of razorback suckers ir. the Upper <br />Basin is found in the upper Green River and lower Yampa River (Tyus 1987). Lanigan and Tyus <br />(1989) estimated that from 758 to 1,138 razorback suckers inhabit the upper Green River. In the <br />Colorado River, most razorback suckers occur in the Grand Valley azea neaz Grand Junction, <br />