My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-05-07_PERMIT FILE - M2013007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2013007
>
2013-05-07_PERMIT FILE - M2013007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:20:16 PM
Creation date
5/9/2013 7:46:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2013007
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/7/2013
Doc Name
Response Items to Protest Letters
From
Greg Lewicki And Associates, PLLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M- 2013- Doi <br />Greg Lewicki And Associates, PLLC <br />11541 NVarrington Court Phone: (303) 346 -5196 Fax (303 }340 -693-4 <br />Parker, CO USA 80135 L -Mail: info(-d)le-*cicki.biz <br />May 6, 2013 DECEIVE p <br />Wally Erickson M�v o 2013 <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety L)IVISIONOF" 6C <br />LA CR 233 Suite A -2 M/N/NGAND SAFETY ON <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />RE: Response items to protest letters for Rocky Mtn Aggregate and Construction <br />Uncompahgre Pit based on letter dated April 26, 2013 from Wally Erickson <br />Wally: <br />We have received from you the new protest letters from various people which now add to <br />26 total. <br />As we stated before, it is important to state that the operator Rocky Mountain Aggregate <br />and Construction, LLC takes any protest very seriously. All of the newest letters concern <br />items that are covered by the Special Use process in Montrose County and are not subject <br />to DRMS jurisdiction. However, it must be stated that these concerns have been taken <br />seriously, such as the truck traffic and dust on T Road, as well as the access onto <br />Highway 550, and the plans have been modified to address these concerns with Montrose <br />County. <br />The issue of the Gunnison sage grouse has been brought up in the letter from Leigh <br />Robertson and in the letter from Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife: <br />We have conducted additional research on the potential use of the mesa by the grouse. <br />According to records of the Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife, they do take visual <br />observations annually on Sims Mesa. This mesa is a larger area that encompasses the <br />mesa located west of this property but also includes this property, which is really referred <br />to as Moonlight Mesa. It is our understanding that, if no birds have been sighted on the <br />mesa for a 10 year consecutive period, it is not classified as occupied habitat. The <br />enclosed records attached to this letter show that no Gunnison Sage Grouse have been <br />observed by CPW. In addition, all former owners and managers of the property have also <br />written letters stating that they have never seen a sage grouse since their involvement on <br />the property dating back to the 1950's. These letters are also attached. <br />In addition, a letter is attached from the CPW to the US Fish and Wildlife Service dated <br />April 1, 2013 which states that CPW is against the listing of the Gunnison Sage Grouse <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.