My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-15_REVISION - M1977306 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977306
>
2013-04-15_REVISION - M1977306 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:26 PM
Creation date
5/8/2013 2:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977306
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2013
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW #1
From
COTTER
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
DMC
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to DRMS Adequacy Review (1) — Cotter JD -9 Mine Reclamation Plan Amendment <br />sandstone is estimated at 0.04 ft/yr. The mine workings where saturated <br />conditions are located are several hundred feet from the existing monitoring <br />well. Cotter considers the water quality in this well to be indicative of ambient <br />conditions for the Salt Wash sandstone in the area of the JD-9 ore deposit. Data <br />from the monitoring wells shows that ambient groundwater quality is extremely <br />poor. Solely on water quality conditions, the groundwater has no viable use for <br />domestic or agricultural uses. Several constituents are well over water quality <br />standards. <br />Another issue is the distribution of groundwater within the Salt Wash sandstone. <br />The occurrence of groundwater is sporadic in this formation as indicated by <br />mining operations that mine the same rock strata but do not always encounter <br />groundwater. Drilling a background well or a compliance well may or may not <br />encounter groundwater. Requiring additional wells if dry holes are encountered <br />would not be economically reasonable for protecting a highly questionable <br />resource. <br />29. Due to the waste rock containing constituents at levels higher than federal, state and <br />agricultural levels is any type of impermeable liner proposed below the waste rock pile to <br />prevent unpermitted discharges? <br />No liner is planned for the waste rock pile because the majority of the waste rock <br />pile is already in place. The EPP provides a solid case for the lack of any <br />impacts to the environment from the waste rock pile. The waste rock pile sits on <br />low permeable shales and mudstones of the Brushy Basin member of the <br />Morrison Formation. The lack of moisture, geochemical conditions, and low <br />unsaturated hydraulic conductivity values limit the mobility of any uranium <br />related constituents. Kearl (2005) conducted numerical modeling studies of the <br />transport of uranium related constituents from the waste rock pile. This <br />modeling report is provided in the application amendment. Using very <br />conservative assumptions that assumed a worse -case scenario, after 1000 years <br />the concentration of uranium would be 1 /1,000,000 of the initial concentration at <br />a depth of 200 feet below the pile. There is approximately 200 feet of the Brushy <br />WX <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.