My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981022A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981022A
>
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981022A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:30 PM
Creation date
5/2/2013 7:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/29/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scrlia: - 2.05.6 <br />combination of grading, use of sedimentation ponds, and progressive reclamation will protect water <br />• quality and mimmi~r the potential for erosion and excess sediment contributions. Becatue this is a <br />semi-arid area and for the reasons previously discussed under water chemistry and water quality <br />impacts, no significant impacts are anticipated due to any limited infiltration and leaching which may <br />occur. <br />OMI's planned mining and related activities have the potential to cause localized and temporary <br />impacts to ground water. These probable ground water hydrologic consequences include: <br />Alterations of ground water flow patterns <br />Drainage of seeps/springs <br />Increases in concentrations of TDS and certain individual chemical constiruents <br />Muting-related probable hydrologic corssequences for ground water resources in the Somerset, <br />Sanborn Creek and Elk Creek pemut and adjacent areas will be limited by the lack of significant <br />ground water recharge in the area, the existence of a thick sequence of low pemteability bedrock <br />layers between the coal seams to be mined and the ground surface, the general lack of significant <br />regional ground water movement due the absence of well defined regional aquifers, and very limited <br />beneficial ground water use in the permit and adjacent areas due to depth and water quality <br />considerations. Probable ground water consequences are disctsssed in the following sectioru. <br />There is no identified regional aquifer above or below the mine workings. The only ground water <br />units of any significance in the OMI permit and adjacent areaz are the petthed ground water <br />occurring in certain coal seams and the associated clastic interburden sequences and in the overlying <br />overburden materials; and the alluvium/colluvium of the Nortkt Fork of the Gunnison River. The <br />Rollins Sandstone is not coruidered an aquifer for the reasons previously discussed, is well below the <br />• sequence to be mined, and is hydrologically isolated From potential mining-related effetts by a thick <br />sequence of relatively impermeable shales, between the Rollins Sandstone and the B-Seam The <br />alluvium/colluvium of the Noah Fork is at an elevation below the D coal seam where it outcrops on <br />the north side of the Noah Fork Valley, with the seam dipping to the nonheazt. <br />While the B-Seam is at a lower elevation than the North Fork in the eastern pan of the mining area, it <br />is hydrologically isolated from the Noah Fork and the associated alluvium/colluvium by a sequence <br />of low-permeability units which will not be affected by mining or subsidence since a broad bamer <br />pillar will be retained between the [nine workings, the North Fork and both the old and the existing <br />State Highway. The strata above and those associated with the mine workings may contain perched <br />aquifers, which could be depleted directly through mining or indirectly through fractums into the <br />mine. However, no water supply wells are known to exist in any local perched aquifers. The <br />potential for future rue of these perched aquifers is severely limited because of the their depth, the <br />steepness of the valley slopes (access corutrairtts), and the limited lateral extent and coruequent <br />storage capacity of the perched units. Even if the peached aquifers were impacted, therefore, it is <br />doubtful that water supply wells or water resources would be impacted now or in the future. <br />Alteratioru of ground water flow patterns will occur az a result of underground mining excavation <br />and consequent mine drainage. These activities will depress the water table in the irrurtediate vicinity <br />of the mine workings, which will induce ground water flow into the underground workings az the <br />hydrologic system adjusts to reestablish stable water levels. Potential ground water inflows are <br />discussed in Section 2.04.7, Hydrologic Description. A shift in ground water flows toward the mine <br />workings will alter existing ground water flow patterns. Natural ground water flows in the immediate <br />vicinity of the underground mine twrlangs will tend to be deflected toward the mine workings under <br />the influence of the cone of depression. This deflection o[ flow will provide some natural mitigation <br />• of flow alteration az flow lines converge around the active mining area to reestablish downgradient <br />flow continuity at some point downdip from the mine workings. <br />PR04 2.05-94 Revised August 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.