My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981022A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981022A
>
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981022A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:30 PM
Creation date
5/2/2013 7:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/29/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Swim ~ 2.05.6 <br />Localized dewatering effects have the potential to temporarily reduce alluvial/colluvial ground water <br />contributions to surface flow in Elk Creek This possibihty is not a significant concern, however, <br />because any potential effects would be limited to the inunediate area of the Elk Creek surface facilities <br />and would «cur over a relatively brief period during construction of the rntne development entnes <br />and ventilation shafu. In addition, the alluvia]/colluvial deposits in the inunediate vicinity of the Elk <br />Creek surface facilities are relatively deep and this portion of Elk Creek appears to be a losing rather <br />than gaining stream reach, so ground water contributions to surface flow are either minimal or <br />negative. <br />OMI's planned underground mining operations may result in passive drainage requiring handling of <br />mine inflows from both existing and proposed mine workings. Potential ground water inflow <br />sources include water which has accumulated in old mine workings, the stratigraphic units directly <br />disturbed by mining, and the overlying perched aquifer system due to downward leakage through <br />subsidence fractures. I~istoric mining operations did not encounter significant quantities of water and <br />it is anticipated that mine inflows maybe limited to specific areas. Any significant mine inflows will <br />be collected and routed to temporary underground sumps for retention and recycling to the <br />operational mine water system Detailed plans for handling of mine drainage are provided in Section <br />2.05.3, Mme Facilities. As mining praeeds, any significant ground water inflows may result in a <br />temporary 1«alized reduction in the potentiometric surface. During mining operations a 1«alized <br />cone of depression will develop, however, the mine workings will fill with water after operations cease <br />and water levek in the mined area will reach equilibrium with the water table in surrounding areas. <br />Specific mine design, operation, and monitoring measures including layout and sizing of mine <br />openings based on subsidence evaluatiotu, the use of longwall mining methods, retention of bamer <br />pillars and limited extrattion in critical areas, and ongoing subsidence monitoring, should effettively <br />limit subsidence and any related ground water impacts. Mme design and operational control <br />• measures, when combined with mining depth should m;n;m;>P fracture propagation at or neaz the <br />ground surface in areas overlying the underground workings effectively limiting drainage of perched <br />aquifers and alteration of surface infiltration characteristics. Where subsidence fractures do intercept <br />perched aquifers, resulting ground water drainage and overall effects on the ground water system are <br />expected to be minirrtal since the areal extent and ass«iated storage capacity of typical perched <br />aquifers in this area are limited. <br />Mme workings will not extend under the alluvium of the North Fork Mme layout a designed so the <br />lateral extent of subsidence will extend no funkier south than the north edge of old State Id,gltway <br />133. Old State F~Lgltway 133 is north of the North Fork alluvium therefore, mining should not have <br />an adverse effect on the alluvium of the North Fork of the Gunnison River. There should be no <br />seepage from the Rolliru Sandstone up into the Sanborn Creek NLne B-Seam floor, due to the <br />intervening 8.5 feet of relatively impermeable shale bed, the limited amount of grotrnd water in the <br />Rollins unit, and its low permeability and transmissiviry. The fact that the Beaz Mmes and the old <br />Somerset Mute did not experience seepage up though the floor of the B-Seam further support this <br />conclusion. Similarly, the proposed Elk Creek D-Seam Mine is even higher in the stratigraphic <br />sequence, further m;~;m;z;ng the potential for seepage from below. <br />As described in Section 2.05.6, Subsidence Survey, Subsidence Control, and Subsidence Monitoring <br />Plan, surface subsidence effects are expected to be minimal involving relatively uniform and limited <br />reductions in surface elevations and development of minor surface tension fractures. Relatively small <br />tension fractures will heal relatively quickly with the natural processes of material consolidation and <br />sedimentation resulting in fracture filling and elirrtiriation of the fractures as prnential infiltration <br />channels within a short time period. <br />Underground mining operations will expose coal, floor, and roof materials to oxidation and increased <br />leaching as ntirtirtg is completed and working areas are abandoned. Natural caving will ako expose <br />substantial quantities of broken coal and roof material to oxidation and leaching as groundwater <br />floods these areas. It is anticipated pH will increase slightly and the ground water chemistry will <br />PR04 2.05-85 Revised August 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.