Laserfiche WebLink
Hayden Gulch Loadout <br />Technical Revision 10 <br />Page 2 <br />acreage; it is likely this discrepancy is due to rounding. This page is also missing in the <br />electronic copy of the appendix on the Division's website. Page 3 -1.1 should be included in <br />Appendix 3 -1, please add it to your copy of the permit application. <br />Response: HGL has reviewed our copy of the permit and it appears that Appendix 3 -1 was most <br />recently updated in PR -01 (10/2011). Attached is a copy of the most recent updated page 3 -1.1. <br />This page also indicated the reconciled acreage that HGL is using for all submittals. <br />4. In regards to Item #8 of the Division's adequacy review for RN4 for Appendix 3 -1, the <br />legal description of the Tie Across Haul Road could not be located in the Division's hard <br />copy of the permit application package. This information is also not included in the <br />Division's electronic copy of the permit or in the Division's files with the revised pages <br />for PRI. Your technical revision cover page indicates your copy of the permit contains <br />this information; please submit a copy of these pages so the Division can update its <br />copies. <br />Response: HGL has reviewed our copy of the permit and it appears that Appendix 3 -1 was most <br />recently updated in PR -01 (10/2011). Attached is a copy of the most recent updated page 3 -1.1, <br />which contains the legal description for all of HGL permit area and the reconciled acreage that <br />HGL is using for all submittals. <br />Tab 12; Facilities <br />5. The revised page 6 of Tab 12 in regards to HG Shallow well No.1 indicates the well <br />abandonment report for this well is located in Tab 14, attachment 14 -4. There does not <br />appear to be an attachment 14 -4 in Tab 14. There does not appear to be an attachment <br />14 -4 in Tab 14. However, also included with TRIO was the well abandonment report for <br />this well, the insertion instructions indicate this report should be included in Appendix 7- <br />4. Please revise page 6 accordingly. <br />Response: Page 6 has been revised accordingly to remove reference to Tab 14.. <br />Tab 20; Reveeetation Plan: <br />6. .Items #25 and 26 of the Divisions adequacy review for RN4 discusses the post mine <br />vegetation designation along the Tie - Across Haul Road Exhibit 20 -2 depicts areas to be <br />revegetated as cropland using small grains. However, the text of Tab 20 does not <br />contain a seed mixture or any revegetation plan for the cropland area. Also, the text <br />does not explain the measures to be used to determine the success of revegetation in <br />accordance with Rule 4.15.9 for cropland areas. This information will need to be <br />included in the permit. <br />Response: Following review of Exhibit 20 -2, it appears clear about what the "Cropland" seed <br />mix is, i.e. small grains (wheat, oats, barley, or other numerous species). The Division must <br />