My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-24_REVISION - C1981019 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-04-24_REVISION - C1981019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:49 PM
Creation date
4/30/2013 7:55:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/24/2013
Doc Name
Colowyo Hydrologic Curve Number (Interoffice Memo)
From
Rob Zuber
To
File
Type & Sequence
TR95
Email Name
DIH
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Interoffice Memo <br />Date: April 24, 2013 <br />To: File for Colowyo Mine (C- 1981 -019) <br />Cc: Dan Hernandez <br />From: Rob Zuber <br />RE: Colowyo Hydrologic Curve Numbers (TR -95) <br />The following is my rational for approving TR -95, which is an application to update the hydrologic <br />curve numbers associated with reclaimed mined lands (Exhibit 7 of the Colowyo Permit Application <br />Package). It should be noted that TR -95 does not impact modeling for watersheds in the East Pit area, <br />including those that drain to Prospect Pond, Gulch A Pond, or Streeter Pond. <br />I have reviewed literature related to identifying soil types, which are used for selecting hydrologic <br />curve numbers to be used in SEDCAD models. This includes the National Engineering Handbook, <br />Part 630; the Strifller and Rhodes report (sponsored by OSM and completed in 1981). Based on this <br />literature as well as my professional judgment, I have determined the following options for identifying <br />soil types, in order of preference: <br />1. Based on site - specific infiltration studies <br />2. Based on studies at nearby sites. <br />3. Based on pre- mining soils at the site. <br />I have been encouraging Colowyo to perform the site - specific infiltration studies, and they indicated at <br />one point in the adequacy process that they might be amenable to performing the study. However, <br />now they are saying that their management will not spend the money on any studies. To my <br />knowledge, we have not required other operators to do this, so I do not feel comfortable requiring <br />Colowyo to perform the study. <br />The second option is what Colowyo is proposing. They are sighting a study performed by Colorado <br />State University staff (and sponsored by OSM) that indicates that the regraded spoil areas on a portion <br />of Colowyo and at several other coal mines in Colorado have the hydrologic properties (namely <br />infiltration) of Hydrologic Soil Group A and B soils. <br />The third option is not a good method. As it states in the National Engineering Handbook (page 7 -5 in <br />Part 630), "As a result of construction and other disturbances, the soil profile can be altered from its <br />natural state and the listed group assignments generally no longer apply, nor can any supposition based <br />on the natural soil be made that will accurately describe the hydrologic properties of the disturbed soil." <br />Unfortunately, when TR -73 was approved in 2009, this method was the primary justification for <br />classifying Colowyo's spoil piles as Hydrologic Soil Group C. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.