My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-19_REPORT - C2009087 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2013-04-19_REPORT - C2009087 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:41 PM
Creation date
4/23/2013 9:57:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/19/2013
Doc Name
2012 Testing For revegetation Success for Phase III Bond Release Year One of Two
From
Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
which sheep fescue differs morphologically from the native Festuca saximontana (Rocky Mountain <br />fescue) is very minimal. Here all occurrences in the reclaimed and reference areas have been called F. <br />saximontana. <br />Photographic Record <br />Within each area, representative color photographs were taken to document the appearance of the <br />vegetation in 2012 (Appendix F). Where appropriate, a placard identifies the particular area and sample. <br />Statistical Methods <br />Sampling was conducted at randomly located sites. Random sampling locations were generated using <br />ESRI ArcMap 9.3 software and Hawth's Analysis Tools for ArcGIS (Beyer 2004). Garmin GPS60 units <br />(accuracy to 3 m) and topographic maps were used in the field to locate random points. Cover and <br />woody plant transects were randomly oriented; production samples were located randomly behind the <br />transect origin. At each cover /woody plant density sampling location, the slope, expressed as a percent, <br />and aspect of the site, in degrees not corrected for magnetic declination, were determined and recorded, <br />as was the orientation of the transect. <br />Assessment of Reclamation Adequacy <br />GENERAL <br />Formal (statistical) hypothesis testing (see below) was undertaken for the Phase III Bond Release Block <br />(post -law, Permanent program lands). <br />DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE ADEQUACY <br />Sample adequacy for the data collected was evaluated based on total first -hit vegetative cover using the <br />following expression: <br />_ t z s _ <br />n m i td — x )2 <br />Where: n = minimum sample size <br />s = Sample variance (n -1 degrees of freedom) <br />d = Precision (0.10 for cover and production) <br />x = Sample arithmetic mean <br />t = The (a =.10) t -table value for a 1 tail t -test, n -1 degrees of <br />freedom (infinite degrees of freedom may be used if n >30) <br />n = Sample size <br />All such calculations were based on data from a minimum of fifteen samples. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.