My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-11_HYDROLOGY - M1980149
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1980149
>
2013-04-11_HYDROLOGY - M1980149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2013 7:32:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980149
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
4/11/2013
Doc Name
SWSP
From
OSE
To
Clear Water Solutions, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Michelle L. Hatcher <br />Hokestra SWSP <br />April 10, 2013 <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />13. The approval of this substitute water supply plan does not relieve the Applicant and /or <br />landowner of the requirement to obtain a Water Court decree approving a permanent <br />plan for augmentation or mitigation to ensure the permanent replacement of all <br />depletions, including long -term evaporation losses and lagged depletions after gravel <br />mining operations have ceased. If reclamation of the mine site will produce a permanent <br />water surface exposing groundwater to evaporation, an application for a plan for <br />augmentation must be filed with the Division 1 Water Court at least three (3) years prior <br />to the completion of mining to include, but not be limited to, long -term evaporation losses <br />and lagged depletions. If a lined pond results after reclamation, replacement of lagged <br />depletions shall continue until there is no longer an effect on stream flow. <br />14. In accordance with the letter dated April 30, 2010 from the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining, and Safety ( "DRMS "), all sand and gravel mining operators must <br />comply with the requirements of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the Mineral Rules <br />and Regulations for the protection of water resources. The April 30, 2010 letter from <br />DRMS requires that you provide information to DRMS to demonstrate you can replace <br />long term injurious stream depletions that result from mining related exposure of ground <br />water. Pursuant to approach number 3, the County is completing a slurry wall to <br />eliminate the long term evaporation from the. site. No bond has been posted for this <br />work because a financial warranty is not required for a county. <br />15. Dewatering at this site will produce delayed depletions to the stream system. As long as <br />the pit is continuously dewatered, the water returned to the stream system should be <br />adequate to offset the depletions. Dewatering is projected to cease by October 2013 <br />and the post - pumping analysis for the remainder of this approval period has been <br />included in the overall site depletion analysis. A totalizing flow meter is required to be <br />installed on all dewatering operations with actual meter reads used for the final post - <br />pumping depletion analysis. <br />16. This substitute water supply plan may be revoked or modified at any time should it be <br />determined that injury to other water rights has or will occur as a result of this plan. <br />Should this substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or be revoked prior to <br />adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all excavation of product from below <br />the water table, and all other use of water at the pit, must cease immediately. <br />17. In accordance with amendments to §25 -8- 202(7), C.R.S., and Senate Bill 89 -181 Rules <br />and Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine <br />whether the substitute supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to senior <br />appropriators. As such, water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to <br />determine if the water quality is appropriate for downstream water users. <br />18. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall <br />not create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any <br />water court case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the substitute <br />water supply plan. This decision shall not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar <br />manner in any other applications involving other plans or in any proposed renewal of this <br />plan, and shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law <br />contained herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.