My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-11_REVISION - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2013-04-11_REVISION - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:27 PM
Creation date
4/11/2013 12:57:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/11/2013
Doc Name
Letter to SHPO (Emailed) & Attachment
From
DRMS
To
SHPO
Type & Sequence
PR8
Email Name
ZTT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
corridor. WRFO nest records indicate that these territories have historically low rates of nest <br />occupancy (less than 15 percent) and low nest success rates (about 7 percent). Adults return in <br />February and begin nesting in early April. Young are generally fledged by mid -July. <br />The lease tract's limited support of burrowing owl nest activity is associated with those prairie <br />dog towns in and near the lease tract. Most recently, from late April through mid -May, a single <br />bird was noted in 2006 along the Staley Mine Road (burn on western end of lease) and a single <br />bird and pair of birds (failed nest attempt) were documented in 2006 and 2009, respectively, off <br />the southeast corner of the lease tract. Burrowing owl nesting activity is closely associated with <br />the availability of intact prairie dog b -LuTow systems. The utility of prairie dog burrows for owl <br />nesting may be largely lost within three years of burrow inactivity. Occupancy rates and nest <br />densities of burrowing owl tend to be positively correlated with the density of active prairie dog <br />burrows (Klute et al., 2003). <br />Small Mammals <br />Small mammal populations are poorly documented however, recent BLM and CPW surveys <br />found essentially all shrub- steppe communities in the WRFO are dominated by deer mouse and <br />least chipmunk. Region - specific species that are likely to occur in this area (e.g., Merriam's <br />shrew, sagebrush vole, rock squirrel, northern grasshopper mouse) are less common, but display <br />broad ecological tolerance and are widely distributed throughout the region. No narrowly <br />distributed or highly specialized species or subspecific populations are known to inhabit this <br />area. <br />Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Action: <br />Direct and Indirect Effects: <br />The existing infrastructure associated with the mine has not been implicated in serious or <br />noteworthy influences on terrestrial wildlife populations or habitat in GMU 10. The development <br />of infrastructure attributable to the proposed lease tract addition would remain consistent with <br />the long - established rate, intensity, and distribution of disturbances attributable to the mine's <br />operation, and in particular, its subsurface ventilation system. <br />Based on 2009 aerial photography, the long -term accumulation of surface facilities attributable <br />to adjoining lease development was considered representative of those surface facilities that may <br />eventually be constructed on the proposed lease tract. Collective surface disturbance associated <br />with ventilation facilities on the proposed lease tract would amount to about 1.8 percent of the <br />land base (e.g., about 24 acres attributable to access and 32 acres cleared for pads) over the life <br />of the lease. This acreage figure does not account for the staggered development or progressive <br />reclamation of these sites with perennial bunchgrasses and forbs. At the present time, much of <br />the lower Red Wash watershed, and especially its alluvial bottomlands, are represented by <br />ground cover dominated or heavily influenced by invasive annual weeds, primarily cheatgrass, <br />which fail to provide effective wildlife - related forage or cover. After reclamation of these <br />disturbances, vegetation would be expected to be comparable to or superior to pre - disturbance <br />ground cover in terms of forage value and ground cover. Although elevating the ecological status <br />of the existing plant community represents an incremental benefit to virtually all forms of <br />terrestrial wildlife, including small mammals, as forage or cover, the overall contribution to <br />improving community trends would be negligible. <br />DOI- BLM -CO- 110- 2012- 0023 -EA 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.