My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-11_REVISION - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2013-04-11_REVISION - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:27 PM
Creation date
4/11/2013 12:57:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/11/2013
Doc Name
Letter to SHPO (Emailed) & Attachment
From
DRMS
To
SHPO
Type & Sequence
PR8
Email Name
ZTT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Utah (e.g., oil and gas development, livestock grazing, vehicle -based recreation and shooting <br />sports, proliferation of invasive annual weeds), and relative to the extent of functional habitat <br />that remains available in the more immediate lower Red Wash and Scullion Gulch watersheds, as <br />discussed in the text above, are immeasurably small and undetectable at any landscape scale and <br />are of no practical consequence to the abundance, distribution, or viability of any special status <br />animal. <br />Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative: <br />Direct and Indirect Effects: There would be no action authorized that would have <br />potential to further influence populations or habitats of special status species. <br />Cumulative Effects: The incremental contribution of lease tract development on adverse <br />habitat modifications or behavioral influences at the regional or local scale would not occur. <br />However, considering the project's short-term nature and diminutive surface expression, the <br />consequence of not leasing or developing the Red Wash Tract would, in the case of the Colorado <br />River fishes, black - footed ferret, white - tailed prairie dog, burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, <br />greater sage - grouse, and Brewer's sparrow, be immeasurably small and practically undetectable <br />at any landscape scale. <br />Stipulations to be Applied as Mitigation: <br />1. The WRFO would continue to conduct project - specific prairie dog and raptor surveys as <br />necessary to accommodate the siting of dispersed and small -scale surface activities. <br />RMP- approved timing limitations and no- surface - occupancy provisions would be applied <br />as stipulations or Conditions of Approval to known and subsequently discovered raptor <br />nests (see Terrestrial Wildlife section). <br />2. Surface use or disturbance that may adversely influence the subsurface integrity of prairie <br />dog burrow systems or disrupt reproductive activities (April 1 through May 31) will be <br />avoided as much as practical. This condition applies to all prairie dog towns, including <br />those currently mapped within the following subdivisions: <br />Township 2 North, Range 101 West, Sixth Principal Meridian <br />Section 18: S1 /2NESW, Lot3; <br />Section 21: S1 /2NE, NWSE; <br />Section 22: SWNW, SESE; <br />Section 23: S1 /2SW, SWSE; <br />Section 26: NE, E1 /2NW, NESE; <br />Section 27: NENE, NESW. <br />Finding on the Public Land Health Standard #4 for Special Status Species: <br />Leasing of this tract would be expected to extend the existing BME operation for about 10 years. <br />Over that period of time, leasing and development of the Red Wash Tract, as conditioned, would <br />maintain the current rate and extent of surface facilities that are required for mine ventilation. <br />The influences associated with this mine's surface facilities and activities on special status <br />wildlife resources, including listed and BLM- sensitive fishes of the White River, white - tailed <br />prairie dogs, black - footed ferret, burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, and Brewer's sparrow have <br />remained localized and discountable over the past 30 years and there is no information to suggest <br />that the overall effect of the Proposed Action on the abundance or distribution of these species <br />DOI- BLM -CO- 110- 2012- 0023 -EA 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.