My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-08_REVISION - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2013-04-08_REVISION - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:24 PM
Creation date
4/9/2013 11:40:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/8/2013
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Reviews.
From
Cotter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom Kaldenbach <br />April 5, 2013 <br />Page 8 <br />seeping water at the base of the backfilled area could be blocked as the fill settles, resulting in <br />much of the fill becoming saturated with the seeping water. <br />A seepage rate of 1 gpm in the Glory Hole would be sufficient to saturate the entire 56,000 cubic <br />yards of backfilled alluvial fill in less than 2 years (assuming the fill has 15% porosity). Alluvial <br />material is proposed to be backfilled in the Glory Hole to a height greater than 150 feet. If this <br />material becomes saturated it could exert more than 150 feet of head on the hydraulic seal in the <br />Steve Level at the base of the fill and exceed the seal's designed maximum pressure of 120 feet of <br />head. <br />A three - dimensional drawing showing the flow path of groundwater from the Glory Hole to the <br />mine pool is shown in Figure 3 attached to this document. The Glory Hole was mined out along <br />the Nebraska vein, Colorado vein, Kansas vein, and the Flat vein as shown in Figure 4 attached to <br />this document. Within the Glory Hole, any infiltrating groundwater percolates downward <br />vertically toward the underlying mine pool as shown by the blue arrows in Figure 3. Because <br />flow is driven by gravity, the vertical component of flow is dominant. In some cases, the vertical <br />flow may have an angular component, as water seeps down the excavated face of the <br />underground workings (Figure 3). <br />The Glory Hole is only one potential pathway for vertical infiltration of groundwater to the mine <br />pool. Numerous additional veins were mined on and between the Charlie and Steve Levels <br />(Figure 4) and several airway intake and exhaust holes were constructed between various levels <br />of the mine. The inactive #2 Shaft extends from the Charlie Level to the Steve Level. The #2 <br />Shaft, air holes, drawpoints, stopes, and other conduits would not be filled with the backfill that is <br />proposed for placement in the Glory Hole and will be available as pathways for vertical seepage <br />to groundwater in the mine pool. <br />The volume of backfill proposed for placement into the Glory Hole (32,000 — 54,000 cubic yards <br />( "cyds ")) is one third to one half of the total calculated volume of underground workings above <br />the Steve Level [95,140 cyds, including the network of drifts, shafts, winzes, and raises on and <br />between Charlie, Minnesota, CV, LBJ, and Upper Levels]. The backfill is not expected to <br />become saturated because these remaining mine voids will allow downward vertical percolation <br />of groundwater, thus preventing head buildup within the backfill. <br />The backfill itself is expected to maintain sufficiently high permeability (hydraulic conductivity) <br />to transmit the small quantities of infiltrating precipitation that occur seasonally. The backfill <br />will be placed in the mine without the possibility of mechanical compaction, and as a result, the <br />backfill density will remain relatively low and permeability will remain relatively high. When <br />excavated and dumped into the Glory Hole, the initial hydraulic conductivity is expected to be <br />greater than the existing in situ hydraulic conductivity (K) of the alluvium and fill (5.0x10 -3 to <br />1.7x10 -2 cm /sec, or 14 to 48 ft/day). Although the change in K that occurs during settlement and <br />gravity compaction may be difficult to quantify, the characteristics of the waste rock and alluvial <br />fill material (low clay content, blocky, competent, no secondary clay alteration) will prevent <br />significant compaction. If the hydraulic conductivity of the placed backfill decreased to one tenth <br />the lowest measured hydraulic conductivity of the in situ alluvium and fill (from 14 ft /day to 1.4 <br />ft/day), the backfill would be capable of transmitting 34.4 gpm,* which is significantly higher <br />than the rate of precipitation infiltration over the backfill area. [ *Maximum possible seepage rates <br />through the backfill to the local water table (mine pool) can be estimated using a Darcy <br />calculation where Q = KIA. In this equation, K is hydraulic conductivity (1.4 ft/day), I is the <br />gradient (unit vertical gradient of 1.0 ft/ft), and A is the area of the seepage face above the water <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.