My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-08_HYDROLOGY - C1981041 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2013-04-08_HYDROLOGY - C1981041 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:19:15 PM
Creation date
4/9/2013 10:01:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
4/8/2013
Doc Name
1st Quarter 2013 Impoundment Yearly Inspection
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Prof Pond Certifications
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SNOWCAP COAL COMPANY <br />NORTH AND SOUTH PORTALS <br />IMPOUNDMENT YEARLY INSPECTION <br />In accordance with Rule 4.05.9(14), all impoundments shall be inspected at least yearly to <br />determine if the impoundment has been maintained as designed, and in accordance with the <br />approved plan and the applicable regulations. This yearly inspection is for the impoundment <br />located at the South Portal. <br />On March 19, 2013, I performed the required yearly inspection. I, J. E. Storer, have a wide <br />variety of experience in the design and construction of earth fill embankments. Nothing was <br />observed during the inspection that would indicate the pond has a potential for failure. There <br />was no appearance of erosion, instability, structural weakness or other hazardous conditions. <br />There are no required monitoring procedures or instrumentation other than quarterly and yearly <br />inspections. There are no aspects which might affect stability and there is no required <br />maintenance. The impoundment was not discharging during the inspection. <br />Pond 6, 10, 11, 13 and CBA-1 were reclaimed during 2012. <br />Pond 7, 8 and the north decline east and west non - discharging sumps were reclaimed in <br />2011 <br />Pond 9 collects run -off from the South Portal and RSRDA. The pond was dry during the <br />inspection. Volume III, Appendix 13 -2, page RSS -15 & 15i shows that its design water and <br />sediment capacities are 0.33 A -F and 0.33 A -F respectively. The sediment was removed from <br />the pond during 2003 so the pond had a total depth of 9-feet. Sediment (2.6) has accumulated <br />in the pond since it was cleaned. The percent of sediment buildup is 60% (2.6' deep divided by <br />4.3' maximum depth). Based on this sediment buildup and a 2003 survey of the pond after <br />sediment was removed, the pond has the following estimated capacity. <br />To the best of my knowledge a . •belief,° the;ifngoundment, has been maintained as designed <br />and in accordance with the r roved_plan ariO,atilicable regulations. <br />11*e <br />l a c 5 ( ze 1 3 ,_?,:,, <br />Jt E. Storer F ' / <br />Colorg Vrofessiorr-jineer <br />Regis 1:ONo:) 1' <br />Date <br />Water <br />Sediment <br />Total <br />Pond 9 - A -F <br />0.66 <br />0.15 <br />0.81 <br />SNOWCAP COAL COMPANY <br />NORTH AND SOUTH PORTALS <br />IMPOUNDMENT YEARLY INSPECTION <br />In accordance with Rule 4.05.9(14), all impoundments shall be inspected at least yearly to <br />determine if the impoundment has been maintained as designed, and in accordance with the <br />approved plan and the applicable regulations. This yearly inspection is for the impoundment <br />located at the South Portal. <br />On March 19, 2013, I performed the required yearly inspection. I, J. E. Storer, have a wide <br />variety of experience in the design and construction of earth fill embankments. Nothing was <br />observed during the inspection that would indicate the pond has a potential for failure. There <br />was no appearance of erosion, instability, structural weakness or other hazardous conditions. <br />There are no required monitoring procedures or instrumentation other than quarterly and yearly <br />inspections. There are no aspects which might affect stability and there is no required <br />maintenance. The impoundment was not discharging during the inspection. <br />Pond 6, 10, 11, 13 and CBA-1 were reclaimed during 2012. <br />Pond 7, 8 and the north decline east and west non - discharging sumps were reclaimed in <br />2011 <br />Pond 9 collects run -off from the South Portal and RSRDA. The pond was dry during the <br />inspection. Volume III, Appendix 13 -2, page RSS -15 & 15i shows that its design water and <br />sediment capacities are 0.33 A -F and 0.33 A -F respectively. The sediment was removed from <br />the pond during 2003 so the pond had a total depth of 9-feet. Sediment (2.6) has accumulated <br />in the pond since it was cleaned. The percent of sediment buildup is 60% (2.6' deep divided by <br />4.3' maximum depth). Based on this sediment buildup and a 2003 survey of the pond after <br />sediment was removed, the pond has the following estimated capacity. <br />To the best of my knowledge a . •belief,° the;ifngoundment, has been maintained as designed <br />and in accordance with the r roved_plan ariO,atilicable regulations. <br />11*e <br />l a c 5 ( ze 1 3 ,_?,:,, <br />Jt E. Storer F ' / <br />Colorg Vrofessiorr-jineer <br />Regis 1:ONo:) 1' <br />Date <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.