My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-03-15_REVISION - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2013-03-15_REVISION - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:15:07 PM
Creation date
3/18/2013 1:58:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/15/2013
Doc Name
Review (Memo)
From
Mike Boulay
To
Brock Bowles
Type & Sequence
TR44
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Brock Bowles <br />FROM: Mike Boulay frig <br />DATE: March 15, 2013 <br />SUBJECT: Keenesburg Mine Permit No. C- 1981 -028 <br />Technical Revision No. 44 (TR -44) <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />1. The operator should specify in the permit document the timeframe for conducting the <br />sampling and analysis (e.g., spring & fall). <br />2. The operator should also update the permit document to include a statement that <br />quarterly sampling will resume at least one year prior to final bond release. <br />Please let me know if you have questions. <br />C: Sandy Brown <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />-&- <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Govemor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pirleda <br />Director <br />I have reviewed TR -44 for the Keenesburg Mine regarding their request to revise the Subsurface <br />Water Monitoring Analysis schedule from quarterly to semi - annually. I concur with their plan as <br />proposed and recommend approval for this revision. We have compiled an extensive amount of <br />data for this site and to date no significant impacts to groundwater have been identified. It is <br />reasonable to reduce the monitoring frequency for an operator where no significant impacts are <br />detected and they are several years out from requesting final bond release. I only have minor <br />comments regarding the revision application. <br />Office of Office of <br />Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.